Home > Mandy the one man law-maker > Posted in Intellectual Property

  • Mandy the one man law-maker

    January 14, 2010

    The Digital Economy Bill continues to be a political hot potato as the government backtracks on key provisions following a wave of criticism.

    On this occasion, the issue making the headlines is the proposed “Clause 17”, a provision which would enable the Secretary of State, Lord Mandelson, to make amendments to the Copyright Designs and Patents Act without first consulting Parliament.

    In December, top level executives from Google, Yahoo!, eBay and Facebook expressed strong concerns about this in an open letter to Lord Mandelson, the closing line of which reads “we urge you to remove Clause 17 from the bill.” The crux of their complaint is that the controversial provision could pave the way for arbitrary measures and a high degree of uncertainty if new laws can be fast-tracked through the system on a whim.

    The government has made a number of concessions in order to allay some of these fears including proposals to water down the powers conferred upon the Secretary of State. In particular, a 60 day consultation period has been proposed, as has an evidential test whereby it must be shown that harm would result if the amendments were not made. In addition, the power cannot be used to create or modify a criminal offence. In spite of mounting opposition to the clause, the government remains in support ofit, stressing that the new powers are required in order to “future-proof” copyright law as new technologies develop.

    Whilst most will appreciate that the law must evolve in line with technology, Clause 17 allows the Secretary of State effectively to rewrite primary legislation with a minimum level of Parliamentary scrutiny making this clause, perhaps, a step too far.

    Mark Daniels

    Mark Daniels

    Specialises in intellectual property dispute resolution involving infringement and validity of patents, trade marks, designs and copyright, as well as reputation management and domain name disputes.

    +44 (0)121 237 3993

    email Mark Daniels

    follow me on LinkedIn Follow Mark on LinkedIn


  • 2015 (200)
  • 2014 (299)
  • 2013 (374)
  • 2012 (469)
  • 2011 (421)
  • 2010 (226)
  • 2009 (32)


Opinions tagged as...

litigation free schools government James Arrowsmith Ofsted employment child protection Mark Blois Gemma Steele NHS Fiona Carter personal injury Dai Durbridge Court of Appeal insurance Social Care Sarah Erwin-Jones Richard Freeth advertising Claims Brands academies Browne Jacobson LLP Browne Jacobson Intellectual Property copyright Data Protection teachers Hayley Roberts DfE local authorities Richard Nicholas High Court schools Department for Education Nichola Evans Laura Richards trade marks Public Sector education