Home > Ignore the risk of grooming at your peril > Posted in Education, Social Care

  • Ignore the risk of grooming at your peril

    February 9, 2012

    The debate on the safeguarding proposals in the Protection of Freedoms Bill continued today. And, regardless of expert views to the contrary, the government refuses to accept the risk of grooming posed by people who will be able to work with children unchecked.

    As the Bill stands a ‘supervised volunteer’ in a school would not be undertaking ‘Regulated Activity’ and therefore no checks would be required. This means that an individual who is barred from working with children could still volunteer with children as long as he is supervised. That cannot be right.

    This ignores the fact that children see all adults in schools (and other settings) as appropriate and trustworthy. It allows an adult to build a trusting relationship during schools hours and to exploit it out of hours. In other words, to groom and then abuse a child.

    Even Lord Bichard has pleaded for a change, but thus far such pleas have fallen on deaf ears.

    Dai Durbridge

    Dai Durbridge

    Specialises in defence claims for social services, education and care providers; risk management presentations and workshops on child protection in education.

    +44 (0)115 976 6578

    email Dai Durbridge

    follow me on LinkedIn Follow Dai on LinkedIn



Opinions tagged as...

Public Sector Nichola Evans Mark Blois further education copyright Claims Social Care Laura Richards Browne Jacobson employment tribunal schools Intellectual Property Dai Durbridge education government James Arrowsmith personal injury litigation Department for Education employment Hayley Roberts teachers child protection Richard Freeth academies adult safeguarding Sarah Erwin-Jones Gemma Steele Court of Appeal Oliver Sweeney local authorities NHS Browne Jacobson LLP Brands trade marks Ofsted free schools Fiona Carter Richard Nicholas advertising