Home > Ignore the risk of grooming at your peril > Posted in Education, Social Care

  • Ignore the risk of grooming at your peril

    February 9, 2012

    The debate on the safeguarding proposals in the Protection of Freedoms Bill continued today. And, regardless of expert views to the contrary, the government refuses to accept the risk of grooming posed by people who will be able to work with children unchecked.

    As the Bill stands a ‘supervised volunteer’ in a school would not be undertaking ‘Regulated Activity’ and therefore no checks would be required. This means that an individual who is barred from working with children could still volunteer with children as long as he is supervised. That cannot be right.

    This ignores the fact that children see all adults in schools (and other settings) as appropriate and trustworthy. It allows an adult to build a trusting relationship during schools hours and to exploit it out of hours. In other words, to groom and then abuse a child.

    Even Lord Bichard has pleaded for a change, but thus far such pleas have fallen on deaf ears.

    Dai Durbridge

    Dai Durbridge

    Specialises in defence claims for social services, education and care providers; risk management presentations and workshops on child protection in education.

    +44 (0)115 976 6578

    email Dai Durbridge

    follow me on LinkedIn Follow Dai on LinkedIn



Opinions tagged as...

teachers Public Sector adult safeguarding Court of Appeal Claims Richard Nicholas schools Department for Education Intellectual Property Social Care Hayley Roberts local authorities trade marks personal injury litigation Gemma Steele government James Arrowsmith employment child protection Laura Richards Ofsted free schools employment tribunal Fiona Carter Dai Durbridge advertising Mark Blois Browne Jacobson further education Sarah Erwin-Jones Nichola Evans Browne Jacobson LLP Richard Freeth education Oliver Sweeney NHS academies Brands copyright