Home > Ofsted reduce inspection warning > Posted in Education, Further Education

  • Ofsted reduce inspection warning

    May 30, 2012

    In what looks like touch of backtracking, Ofsted have today announced that their proposal for “no-notice” inspections has been scrapped in favour of notice being given to heads the afternoon before inspection. The intention is to provide schools with the opportunity to inform parents and “make logistical arrangements”.

    The original proposal for no-notice inspections was highly controversial with a general feeling amongst teachers that Ofsted was trying to catch them out. As the current system allows for two days notice, what the removal of 36 hours is supposed to achieve is unclear. Ofsted’s original reasoning was that schools attempt to portray a stronger impression by sending “bad” pupils home prior to inspection. If this practice was a risk with two days notice, it is not significantly less of a risk with half day notice.

    What the change does do is limit the time Heads and the SLT are afforded to “make logistical arrangements”, putting them under unnecessary pressure prior to inspection. With confidence in Ofsted already low amongst teachers, this latest change will do nothing to improve their standing across the profession.

    Dai Durbridge

    Dai Durbridge

    Specialises in defence claims for social services, education and care providers; risk management presentations and workshops on child protection in education.

    +44 (0)115 976 6578

    email Dai Durbridge

    follow me on LinkedIn Follow Dai on LinkedIn

Archives

Sectors

Opinions tagged as...

free schools adult safeguarding further education Public Sector Brands Claims Mark Blois Browne Jacobson LLP copyright Hayley Roberts Ofsted Department for Education Social Care Laura Richards trade marks education academies employment Gemma Steele Richard Freeth Browne Jacobson Richard Nicholas James Arrowsmith Oliver Sweeney employment tribunal government personal injury Nichola Evans schools NHS local authorities Fiona Carter Dai Durbridge Sarah Erwin-Jones teachers child protection Intellectual Property litigation advertising Court of Appeal