Home > Legal Opinions tagged Commercial dispute resolution

  • standard essential patent – valid and infringed

    Mark Daniels

    The English High Court tackled the thorny issue of the alleged infringement of a ‘standard-essential’ patent, and has found for the patentee. Vringo Infrastructure Inc owns a patent (originally obtained by Nokia) relating to the process of soft handover of a mobile phone call between base stations when the phone moves between cells. The patent […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • strength of a parties' case not relevant to case management decisions

    Melanie Chisnall

    The Supreme Court has held in HRH Prince Abdulaziz Bin Mishal Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud v Apex Global Management Ltd & Another that in case management directions or decisions, the strength of a parties’ case would not be relevant to that decision or imposition of any sanctions. The court stated that the decision of the […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • apportionment and the smoker negligently exposed to asbestos

    Bridget Tatham

    In the case of Blackmore v Department for communities & Local Government (2014), the defendant admitted that they had negligently exposed the deceased to asbestos fibres during the course of his employment as a painter, causing lung cancer. But using a relative risk analysis, they sought a reduction of 85% for contributory negligence for the deceased’s […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • removal of the right of compensation for minor RTA claims

    James Arrowsmith

    Proposed amendments to the Social Action Responsibility and Heroism (SARAH) bill aimed at curbing the payment of damages in relation to low value injury claims show that the debate on the cost of whiplash is far from over. Amendments which would have allowed insurers to provide rehabilitation treatment rather than damages in relation to the […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • further rules on fixed cost medical reports

    James Arrowsmith

    The latest draft rules intended to reform soft tissue injury claims give further clarity on how Claims and Underwriting Exchange (CUE) search facilities and expert accreditation will be incorporated before the expected implementation in April 2015. Claimant representatives will be required to undertake searches via AskCUEPI and input a unique reference into the CNF to […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • DBAs: no change for now

    Nichola Evans

    For quite some time commentators have been suggesting that the Government should re-visit the arena of Damages Based Agreements (DBAs) and allow a ‘hybrid agreement’ of a no win, low fee arrangement particularly given the low take up of these agreements. Most recently Lord Justice Jackson joined the debate urging the Government in a recent […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • 'fair, proportionate and effective' – striking out dishonest claims

    Paul Wainwright

    The Transport Committee has published its Fifth Special Report ‘Driving premiums down: fraud and the cost of motor insurance‘. The consultation is an important step in the further implementation of the Jackson reforms, following LASPO 2012. Whilst the ABI figures show improvement with reduced premiums, the AA has noticed a reversing trend. These proposed reforms […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • DBAs will not take off without regulatory reform

    James Arrowsmith

    Damages Based Agreements (DBAs) have failed to gain traction as a result of overly restrictive regulations, according to Jackson who proposed their use in his report on civil costs. DBAs, under which a solicitor receives a percentage of any damages recovered as a fee, have been permitted since April 2013, but uptake has been low. […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • poor claimant funding advice could prove expensive

    Melanie Chisnall

    In the case of McDaniel & Co v Clarke (2014), Mr Justice Hickinbottom ruled that a Master was entitled to hold that the solicitors acting for the claimant were entitled to recover no costs on the basis that the claimant was a member of a trade union and was eligible for free legal representation if […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • can a refusal to mediate be reasonable?

    Chloe Poskitt

    In the case of Northrop v BAE Systems, the court had to determine costs after giving judgment in favour of BAE. Northrop submitted that BAE was entitled to its costs but those costs should be halved to reflect BAE’s unreasonable refusal to mediate. The court examined all the circumstances including the conduct of the parties […]

    Read our legal opinion.

Archives

Sectors

Opinions tagged as...

Laura Richards DfE teachers free schools trade marks copyright education Brands High Court Mark Blois Department for Education Oliver Sweeney government James Arrowsmith Social Care adult safeguarding employment Fiona Carter Browne Jacobson Hayley Roberts local authorities personal injury Claims academies advertising Ofsted Richard Nicholas Browne Jacobson LLP child protection Nichola Evans litigation Public Sector schools Sarah Erwin-Jones Dai Durbridge Court of Appeal NHS Gemma Steele Richard Freeth Intellectual Property