Home > Legal Opinions tagged Intellectual Property

  • ‘Golden Balls’ CTM saga: differing degrees of similarity

    Laura Mackenzie

    Last year we reported on the General Court’s decision that, on a global consideration of the trade marks ‘Golden Balls’ and ‘Ballon D’or’, their visual and phonetic differences (despite their minimal conceptual similarities) meant they were not ‘similar’ under Art 8(1)(b) CTM Regulation 2007/2009 (requiring identical/similar marks for identical/similar goods and a likelihood of confusion) […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • Marks & Spencer’s hopes bloom anew

    Nicola Hill

    The internet keywords case Interflora v M&S has come full circle with the Court of Appeal (CA) referring it back to the High Court for a re-trial. This saga began in 2008, when M&S purchased ad-words which resulted in its floristry ads being displayed when a user searched for ‘interflora’ on Google. Interflora alleged trade […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • renting an orphan – new UK licensing scheme

    Declan Cushley

    A new UK licensing scheme for orphan works has been launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. The scheme enables you to apply for a licence to make use of at least 91 million creative works, some of cultural importance including photographs, diaries, films and recordings, which have previously been effectively unavailable as […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • website blocking order awarded to combat trade mark infringement

    Declan Cushley

    Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court has awarded Cartier, Montblanc and Richemont an order requiring defendant Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to block or impede access by subscribers to six websites advertising and selling counterfeit goods and thereby infringing the claimant’s trade marks. Similar orders have previously been made for copyright infringement under s97A of […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • finding of 'genuine use' ends the Specsavers trade mark saga

    Annabel Sinclair

    The Court of Appeal has concluded that Specsavers’ extensive use of its green shaded logo mark containing the word Specsavers in white also constitutes ‘genuine use’ of its wordless logo mark (two overlapping ovals registered in black and so in respect of all colours). Specsavers’ wordless mark will therefore remain on the register. This is […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • copyright law now has a sense of humour

    Jude King

    On 1 October 2014, The Copyright and Rights in Performances (Quotation and Parody) Regulations 2014 come into force which introduce new copyright infringement exceptions including a specific exception granting the right to parody. The new regulations will extend the fair dealing exception to copyright infringement to include use for the purposes of caricature, parody or […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • no just ‘desserts’ for product shape trade mark

    Laura Mackenzie

    To be registrable a trade mark must not be devoid of any distinctive character; a hurdle that can be overcome if the mark has acquired a distinctive character as a result of its use. Yesterday the EU General Court dismissed an appeal against a decision that a three-dimensional Community trade mark (CTM)for shape of the […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • CJEU considers parody exception in Deckmyn case

    Emma Tuck

    Art. 5(3)(k) of the Infosoc Directive (regarding protection of copyright) provides that member states may provide an exception to the exclusive rights of reproduction and communication granted to an author, in cases of “use for the purpose of caricature, parody or pastiche“. The exception was implemented under Belgian law. However, because the Infosoc Directive requires […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • National Gallery selfies – art or infringement?

    Nicola Hill

    Significant press attention has surrounded the National Gallery’s recent decision to permit visitors to photograph their artworks using mobile phones. Media focus has been on diminishing cultural values and damage through flash photography. But what about the copyright angle? The truth is, copyright in much of the permanent collection has long-since expired. End of story? Actually […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • Police to place anti-piracy warning ads on illegal sites

    Alex Watt

    BBC news reports reports that the City of London Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU) are intending to place banner adverts on websites offering content that is believed to be illegal. The initiative makes use of technology provided by Project Sunblock, swapping paid-for advertising with warnings about piracy asking users to close their browser; “When […]

    Read our legal opinion.

Archives

Sectors

Opinions tagged as...

Laura Richards adult safeguarding Browne Jacobson LLP education child protection trade marks further education Public Sector Mark Blois personal injury Social Care James Arrowsmith litigation Claims NHS government Richard Nicholas Fiona Carter employment Department for Education academies High Court Court of Appeal Ofsted free schools Nichola Evans teachers advertising Intellectual Property Gemma Steele Hayley Roberts local authorities Sarah Erwin-Jones Richard Freeth schools Dai Durbridge Browne Jacobson Oliver Sweeney Brands copyright