Home > Legal Opinions tagged ip

  • It’s all about how you couch it….

    Sara McNeill

    The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has banned Sofa King’s regional press ad which included the slogan “The Sofa King – Where the Prices are Sofa King Low!” after receiving three complaints. The ASA held the slogan could be “interpreted as derivative of a particular swear word which consumer research had found to be a word […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • Government Strategy to open up access to IP for SMEs

    Richard Nicholas

    A Strategy published yesterday and highlighted by the IPO’s press release sets out measures to help small and medium size businesses protect their IP rights. The strategy picks up a number of proposals for the future (such as the creation of a register of IP advisors, online training tool, and provision of audits) and some […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • Chinese Telecoms Firms under US Congressional Investigation

    Dave Drew

    The Chinese phone manufacturer ZTE plans to focus on manufacturing smartphone in a bid to crack the US telecommunications market. ZTE will move from producing lower-end ‘feature phones’ – a hugely successful export to emerging economies like India – and concentrate on fourth generation smartphones. This latest phase of ZTE’s phenomenal rise from its origins […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • The Informed User is Clarified as Pepsi’s Pogs Fail to Appeal

    Ryan Harrison

    The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has followed the Advocate General’s opinion by dismissing an appeal against the General Court’s ruling that Pepsi’s design registration for “pogs” was invalid. The design was previously ruled invalid because it did not create a different overall impression on the informed user than an earlier Promer design. A key […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • No surprises in repackaging ruling

    Giles Parsons

    The European Court of Justice has previously held that trade mark proprietors cannot object to pharmaceuticals being repackaged if repackaging is necessary to market the product, it does not affect the products’ condition, the packaging clearly identifies the repackager, is not defective, and the importer gives notice to the trade mark proprietor. Merck brought two […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • Bunny battle settled

    Oliver Laing

    The long standing dispute between the creators of Miffy and Hello Kitty’s companion Cathy has finally been settled. Miffy, a small white female rabbit, was created in 1955 by Dick Bruna. Cathy, also a small white female rabbit, was created by Sanrio in 1976. In 2010 Mercis Media BV (Mr Bruna’s copyright management firm) brought […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • How to silence an ex-colleague

    Richard Nicholas

    Whether it’s an angry ex-colleague, ex-employee or ex-director – if your business has valuable confidential information that it needs to protect, these people will inevitably know about it. When that person leaves – how do you stop them from disclosing information about your product or company to other suppliers? We looked at practical legal steps […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • Fighting over flowers…

    Alex Kynoch

    M&S has purchased ‘interflora’ as an adword (a Google search for Interflora now displays an advertising link to M&S’ flower delivery service). Does M&S’ use of the word infringe Interflora’s trade mark rights? The Advocate General has now provided an opinion in the case of Interflora v Marks & Spencer stating that a trade mark […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • A Dame, a Knight, and a new arena in which to joust

    Ryan Harrison

    The case of Dame Vivienne Westwood v Anthony Knight [2011] EWPCC 008 witnessed the first trial heard by HHJ Birss QC under the new Patents County Court (PCC) procedural rules. Issues of trade mark infringement, copyright infringement, and passing off aside, the judgment has attracted interest because of Judge Birss’ flexible and streamlined approach to […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • Battle commences over Digital Economy Act

    Nick McDonald

    The Secretary of State for Culture Jeremy Hunt announced that Ofcom will review the feasibility of the blocking powers created by the Digital Economy Act. This perhaps shows that the Government has recognised that these powers, as currently envisaged, will be extremely difficult to implement and may do little to stem the tide of online […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • Location, location, location…does it really matter?

    Paula Dumbill

    The High Court has confirmed that rights infringement of internet hosted material can only occur in the country where the host server is based. In the case of Football Dataco Limited and others v Sportradar, the claimants ran a site which exploited certain data relating to English and Scottish football matches. Sportradar ran a similar […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • Calling all “short” trade mark owners!

    Mark Daniels

    Following on from our opinion earlier in the year, Nominet (the UK domain name registry) will make available certain single character and two letter domain names. From 1 December 2010 until 17 January 2011, owners of registered trade marks which match their desired “short” domain name will have the first option to apply, upon providing […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • Cameron IP review – danger of missing the mark?

    Peter Ellis

    Earlier this month the Prime Minister announced an independent six-month review of the Intellectual Property system in the UK (the “Technology Blueprint”). He said “…the Government can help make Britain the most attractive place in the world to start and invest in innovative technology companies.” However, much of the discussion around IP neglects the value […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • The inventor protected anywhere and everywhere – an infringe...

    Peter Ellis

    “The inventor protected anywhere and everywhere in the same way. What a beautiful dream!” – so said a lawyer of the late 19th Century. Notwithstanding countless international treaties on trade since that time, and the recognition of IP rights across jurisdictions and at both a national and international level, we are still far from international […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • Can you build a trade mark out of Lego?

    Mark Daniels

    The European Court of Justice has ruled that the Lego brick cannot be registered as a trade mark because its shape is necessary to obtain a technical function, ie to enable another Lego brick to be attached to it. The court found that the exclusion applies even where, within the shape, there are other non-essential […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • It’s all Greek to me

    Paula Dumbill

    Do we make assumptions about the origin of goods on the basis of a single letter? The Office of Harmonization for the Internal Market (OHIM) says not – an application for a community trade mark by Borco to register the Greek letter alpha – α – for wines was held to lack distinctive character, being […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • Seriously! Whatever defamation is, it is not trivial

    Mark Daniels

    In the High Court recently, the Telegraph Media Group Limited successfully defended a claim of defamation made by Dr Sarah Thornton, the author of Seven Days in the Art World. The Telegraph successfully argued that the words complained of in its review of the book were not capable of being defamatory.  The judge recognised that […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • Consent under a Co-existence Agreement is a Bar to Opposition

    Sara McNeill

    The High Court has upheld a decision that consent given under a co-existence agreement to the registration of a trade mark for certain goods was a bar to opposition on relative grounds, citing section 5(5) of the Trade Marks Act. Omega Engineering argued that Omega SA had no right to oppose its application to register […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • Election halts defamation success fee reforms

    Mark Daniels

    In March this year, Justice Secretary Jack Straw announced that there would be a 90% reduction in the recoverability of success fees in relation to defamation claims. The plans were also in line with the recommendations laid out by Lord Justice Jackson in his report published back in January.  Publishers welcomed the move but the […]

    Read our legal opinion.

  • Commercial Interpretation of IP Indemnity Clause but Drafters Beware!

    Sara McNeill

    In the recent case of  The Codemasters Software Co. Limited v Automobile Club De L’Ouest (“ACO”), the High Court adopted a commercial approach to interpretation of an IP indemnity in favour of Codemasters.  ACO had warranted under a licence agreement with Codemasters that the use by Codemasters of car manufacturers’ names, trade marks and car […]

    Read our legal opinion.

Archives

Sectors

Opinions tagged as...

further education litigation Claims adult safeguarding teachers government Oliver Sweeney Richard Nicholas Fiona Carter Mark Blois free schools Browne Jacobson LLP Laura Richards copyright Gemma Steele employment tribunal Nichola Evans Hayley Roberts Department for Education advertising Ofsted Browne Jacobson Dai Durbridge academies Brands employment Sarah Erwin-Jones schools Richard Freeth NHS Intellectual Property Social Care child protection local authorities Court of Appeal Public Sector James Arrowsmith personal injury education trade marks