Posts Tagged ‘Apple’

Apple victory over HTC in smartphone patent battle

Wednesday, December 21st, 2011

After a lengthy legal dispute, the International Trade Commission (a US trade panel that investigates patent infringement involving imported goods) has ruled that HTC phones infringe one Apple patent.

HTC will by 19 April 2012 remove from all their devices the infringing feature, which enables the user to convert embedded data (such as a phone number) into a hyperlink.

The ITC embarked on their initial investigation in April 2010 after Apple complained that HTC infringed ten patents, which could have led to a ban of all HTC devices in the US market. Apple later dropped six patents and an ITC judge ruled that HTC had infringed two of the remaining four patents. This overdue final ITC decision, which follows a request for a review of their previous ruling from both companies, has been welcomed by the Taiwanese mobile phone-maker.

This result will be of interest to those following the patent disputes that Apple are embroiled in relating to Android technology, most notably with South Korean rival Samsung.

Laura Mackenzie

Laura Mackenzie
0121 237 3959
lmackenzie@brownejacobson.com

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

How do you like them Apples?

Thursday, October 13th, 2011

A preliminary injunction has been granted in Australia as part of a global intellectual property rights battle between Apple and Samsung.

The two technology giants, both global leaders within the smartphone market, are now battling it out within the rapidly expanding market for personal tablets.

As of April 2011, Apple initiated lawsuits alleging patent infringement for the use of touch screen technology. The claims specifically concern the iPad and Galaxy Tab 10.1, with legal action spanning 10 different countries.

The most recent development concerns a decision taken today (13 October 2011) by Judge Bennett. The judge granted a temporary injunction on the sale of Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 10.1 within Australia, prohibiting participation in the upcoming Christmas sales.

This is yet another victory for Apple, with similar rulings given in Germany and the Netherlands. Despite this, the conflict seems unlikely to die down, as Samsung has threatened injunctions to ban sales of the new iPhone 4S in France and Germany.

Posted by Oliver Laing, who specialises in intellectual property agreements and disputes relating to patents, copyright, trade marks, designs, as well as domain name disputes and reputation management.

Oliver Laing

Oliver Laing
0115 908 4854
olaing@brownejacobson.com

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 10.0/10 (3 votes cast)

Telecoms patent portfolio auctioned for £2.8bn

Monday, July 4th, 2011

The heat looks set to intensify in the telecoms industry as it was announced last week that a consortium of six telecoms companies including Apple, Microsoft, Sony, Research In Motion, Ericsson, and EMC successfully bid against Google and Intel to acquire a portfolio of more than 6,000 patents and patent applications relating to wireless and networking technology, including 4G, from bankrupt Canadian telecoms giant Nortel Networks. The final sale price was at least twice that anticipated.

Google began the bidding, expressing an interest in the portfolio as valuable protection for disputes, particularly relating to Smartphone technology and also Google’s android technology, already the subject of a $6.1bn damages claim from Oracle.

The deal still requires approval from the US and Canadian courts but with the consortium members having a reputation for an aggressive approach to patent litigation no doubt this portfolio will quickly find its way to court with hefty damages claims being asserted.

Posted by Paula Dumbill, who specialises in non-contentious intellectual property, particularly trade marks and copyright, advising in particular on IP exploitation and collaboration agreements and trade mark portfolio management.

Paula Dumbill

Paula Dumbill
0115 976 6059
pdumbill@brownejacobson.com

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

iPhone 4 – in a class of its own

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010

Apple’s iPhone 4, which was only launched last month, has already resulted in the first lawsuit being filed against the company in the United States.

The suit claims that Apple knew that the antenna design of the iPhone 4 caused reception problems, but ‘wilfully, falsely, and knowingly misrepresented material facts relating to the character and quality of the iPhone 4 units.’ It also states Apple failed to use due care by failing to issue a voluntary recall, or at the least waiving the 10% restocking fee for returned iPhone 4s.

If it becomes a successful ‘class action’ suit, Apple would also have to pay damages to anyone else affected by the alleged defects. This case illustrates how quickly a product launch can damage a brand if design defects are discovered. The more high profile the product, the more extensive will be the consumer testing so due diligence is critical to ensure that new products are fit for the marketplace.

So once you ve done your testing and your due diligence is in place – is it ok to be like the CEO of BP and stand by your Brand – or do you bow to the inevitable and accept that whatever happens – the customer is always right?

Fiona Carter

Posted by Fiona Carter
0115 976 6224
fcarter@brownejacobson.com

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

New ITC claim makes life rotten for Apple

Friday, January 15th, 2010

Apple is already embroiled in an International Trade Commission (ITC) dispute with its competitor and mobile phone giant Nokia over alleged infringement of both parties’ patents . Now Apple, along with RIM (of Blackberry fame) are the subject of a new complaint before the ITC brought by Kodak.

Kodak has already successfully enforced its “picture previewing” patent against Samsung and Sun Microsystems in the recent past. In this new complaint to the ITC, Kodak is seeking to enforce the same patent against Apple and RIM, presumably with a view to securing favourable licensing revenue from the handset manufacturers.

This new action reinforces the view that the big players in the technology market regard the ITC as a forum with considerable bite. The ITC’s ability to force a ban on the supply of infringing products together with the ability to award damages within a process which can be far quicker than the equivalent process through the US courts marks it out as a forum of choice.

However, in a world in which open source and standardised technology is prevalent, one might question whether a readily available ban on supply really encourages innovation, or whether it rather leaves technology providers at the mercy of patentees. An environment in which patentees are encouraged to declare their patents as essential to a particular standard and then make them available to be used under licence on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms also exists, but whilst patentees have the threat of an ITC action at their disposal, they will of course continue to use that to maximum effect.

Mark Daniels

Posted by Mark Daniels
0121 237 3993
mdaniels@brownejacobson.com

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

A declaration of war between Nokia and Apple

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

This appears to be nothing short of a declaration of war between Nokia and Apple which potentially paves the way for extensive and prolonged litigation.

The action filed in Delaware, USA, seeks compensation for infringement of 10 “essential” patents that it argues are “fundamental to making devices which are compatible with one or more of the GSM, UMTS and wireless LAN standards”. This has parallels with previous legal disputes, in particular between Nokia and Qualcomm. That litigation focussed principally upon the extent to which certain patents were in fact essential. Here, the battle ground may be more upon whether Nokia’s patents are infringed and of course whether they are valid.

Nokia’s press release suggests that the litigation was preceded by a period of negotiation between the companies. Its decision to get heavy may therefore be an attempt to put commercial pressure on Apple in those negotiations.

The more interesting long-term issue is whether other holders of essential patents will follow suit and bring claims against Apple.

Nick McDonald

Posted by Nick McDonald
0115 976 6198
nmcdonald@brownejacobson.com

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)