<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>law, less ordinary - legal opinions from Browne Jacobson &#187; Civil Litigation Costs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/tag/civil-litigation-costs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress</link>
	<description>law, less ordinary - legal opinions from Browne Jacobson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:26:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CJC working party to progress civil litigation reforms</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/08/05/cjc-working-party-to-progress-civil-litigation-reforms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/08/05/cjc-working-party-to-progress-civil-litigation-reforms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 16:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Professional Indemnity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil justice council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Litigation Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil litigation reforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cjc working party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lord justice jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[one way costs shifting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Part 36]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional indemnity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportionality test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Civil Justice Council are to put together a working party to develop practical proposals on the back of the Government’s plans following Lord Justice Jackson’s review of civil litigation costs. The working party will look at implementing secondary legislation, focusing on qualified one way cost shifting, the introduction of additional sanctions and rewards under [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a title="Civil Justice Council are to put together a working party" href="http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/about-the-judiciary/advisory-bodies/cjc/working-parties/technical-aspects-of-jackson-implementation-costs.htm">Civil Justice Council are to put together a working party</a> to develop practical proposals on the back of the Government’s plans following Lord Justice Jackson’s review of civil litigation costs.</p>
<p>The working party will look at implementing secondary legislation, focusing on qualified one way cost shifting, the introduction of additional sanctions and rewards under Part 36 as well as the detail of the proportionality test and when the test should not be applied.</p>
<p>Crucially, the party will not be considering the government’s original policy objectives but focusing instead on the practicalities of introducing these measures.</p>
<p>The working party are expected to complete papers on these proposals by the end of September this year.</p>
<p>Insurers will be interested to note that representatives from key civil law areas affected by the proposals will be invited by the CJC to attend and provide feedback at a workshop expected to take place in October.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Nichola Evans</strong>, who specialises in <a title="Professional Indemnity" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/insurance_-_professional_indem.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordi nary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=nichola_evans&amp;utm_campaign=insurance_-_professional_indem">professional indemnity work</a>, directors and officers, legal expenses insurance, conditional fee agreements and after the event insurance and commercial litigation.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/nichola_evans_110x110.jpg" alt="Nichola Evans" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Nichola Evans<br />
020 7337 1019<br />
<a title="email Nichola Evans" href="mailto:nevans@brownejacobson.com">nevans@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/08/05/cjc-working-party-to-progress-civil-litigation-reforms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jackson review takes centre stage again</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/07/26/jackson-review-takes-centre-stage-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/07/26/jackson-review-takes-centre-stage-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Litigation Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jackson review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Expense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=1234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government has announced a consultation on implementing the recommendations outlined in Lord Justice Jackson’s review of civil litigation costs. The main thrust of this will be to review CFAs and as to whether they are the best way of achieving justice with the current level of success fees and the way in which ATE [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Jackson_review" href="http://www.postonline.co.uk/post/news/1724660/government-outlines-jackson-review-implementation-plans">The Government has announced a consultation on implementing the recommendations outlined in Lord Justice Jackson’s review of civil litigation costs.</a></p>
<p>The main thrust of this will be to review CFAs and as to whether they are the best way of achieving justice with the current level of success fees and the way in which ATE works.</p>
<p>It is reassuring that the Government is looking at proposals for fixed costs on the fast track and has recognised the unique problems associated with clinical negligence claims. However it has left us in the dark when it comes to non personal injury claims and legal expenses insurance.</p>
<p>It is important the Government clarifies how this will be combined with other measures such as the Lord Young report and the LSB review on referral fees if it seriously wants the industry to engage fully in the debate.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; padding: 2px 2px 10px 2px; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/nichola_evans_110x110.jpg" alt="" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; margin-left: 8px;">Posted by Nichola Evans<br />
0207 337 1019<br />
<a title="email nichola evans" href="mailto:nevans@brownejacobson.com">nevans@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/07/26/jackson-review-takes-centre-stage-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

