Posts Tagged ‘copyright’

Harry Potter doesn’t beat Wizard Willy (yet)

Friday, October 29th, 2010

JK Rowling and her publisher Bloomsbury have failed to get summary judgment against the estate of Adrian Jacobs who is claiming that the Harry Potter novels infringe copyright in Jacobs’ Willy the Wizard novels by copying that book’s plot and themes.

Rowling and Bloomsbury claimed that Jacobs’ claim should be dismissed summarily, as (a) Rowling had not read Willy the Wizard, and (b) the plot and themes she had allegedly copied were too abstract to be protected by copyright.

The allegations of copying were complex, and the defendants had not disclosed Rowling’s drafts or of her agent’s diaries. Similarly, the judge strongly inclined to the view that no copyright subsisted in the plot and themes, but on neither point was the case clear enough to be suitable for summary judgment.

The matter may roll on to court – but with three firms of solicitors and six barristers involved, the loser could face a very large bill, and hopefully common sense will allow the matter to settle.

Posted by Giles Parsons, who specialises in intellectual property agreements and disputes relating to patents, copyright, trade marks, designs, as well as domain name disputes and reputation management.

Giles Parsons

Giles Parsons
0121 237 4557
gparsons@brownejacobson.com

VN:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 7.0/10 (3 votes cast)

Are anti-piracy law firms out of order?

Friday, October 1st, 2010

ACS Law is known for its pursuit of alleged illegal file-sharers by identifying ‘offending’ IP addresses, then forcing ISPs to disclose details of their corresponding subscribers, before demanding compensation for copyright breaches.

This week, ACS suffered an attack on its website, designed to make the site unavailable. During efforts to bring it back online, various documents became publicly accessible, including unencrypted users’ details…with a range of consequences for ACS (and BT).

One issue here is whether ‘Norwich Pharmacal Orders’, typically used to compel ISPs to disclose information, are too freely granted. Amongst other criteria, the applicant has to show that the data requested is relevant to a possible claim, and disclosure is in the interests of justice. The chances of refusal may have been higher if the ISPs had defended ACS’ application, for evidential and confidentiality reasons, rather than taking the usual ‘don’t agree but don’t oppose’ stance!

Laura Phillips

Laura Phillips
0115 976 6182
lphillips@brownejacobson.com

VN:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

A Free Reign for Functionality?

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

The scope of copyright protection for computer programs has come under scrutiny once again. The view of the English Courts has been that copying the functionality of a program which does not involve the copying of source code or graphics does not amount to infringement of the copyright in the program. In SAS Institute v World Programming Limited, the Judge’s preliminary ruling followed the previous court decisions but he acknowledged that guidance on a number of aspects of this area of law was required from the ECJ.  It will be interesting to see if the ECJ upholds the approach taken by the English courts: if it does, then claims will have to be based on the copying of other elements of computer programs such as screen displays. Whilst this approach may be difficult for software owners to accept from an ownership perspective, it does provide the freedom to develop competing software so long as the source code and graphics are not copied.

Posted by Sara McNeill
0121 237 3930
smcneill@brownejacobson.com

VN:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Tightening the net

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

Internet Service Providers (ISPs) could soon be compiling a blacklist of online copyright infringers. Ofcom is currently consulting on the code to be followed by ISPs and how, in practice this will be enforced. The consultation ends on 30 July.

For the first time copyright owners will be able to receive a list of infringers for the purpose of bringing legal proceedings and apply to find out the names of those who are alleged to have infringed.  ISPs may also be required to limit or even block internet use.

The Act (and code) will inevitably make an ISP’s life more complicated, since, as well as blacklisting its own customers, there is a risk they become drawn into the inevitable claim, counterclaim and appeal between copyright owner and alleged infringer.

Richard Nicholas

Posted by Richard Nicholas
0121 237 3992
rnicholas@brownejacobson.com

VN:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

If you’ve infringed your own copyright – should you sue?

Friday, February 26th, 2010

Here’s an idea for a game:  Move a marble-like ball around a computer screen by continually placing train tracks in front of it 

Here’s another one:  Having developed the above programme, move the rights in it from you to your company and then seek to move it back again using the courts and the law of copyright infringement. 

The first idea might seem a decent one.  The second idea is a truly terrible and expensive one and one that developers should avoid at all costs as this case shows.

A freelance developer developed his game concept (called either Tracktrix, or later Train Trax) before he joined Circle Studios as a games developer.  Without telling others in the company that he had developed this concept himself he passed on this concept and encouraged Circle Studios to exploit it. 

Sadly this did not lead to commercial success and Circle Studios went into administration.  Afterwards the developer sought to take back the concept and to do this he claimed, amongst other things – copyright infringement, alleging that Circle Studios had copied the game from him as a freelance developer.  After all he should know…he (as an employee of Circle) had copied it! 

Unsurprisingly perhaps the games developer was unsuccessful.  As the developer had not disclosed where the idea came from, there was no reason for the employer to believe that the concept was not created in the course of his employment.   Any infringement was caused by the developer.  The copyright claim failed, as did a related breach of confidence claim, with the judge lamenting that the action reached the court in the first place.  

The lesson – be clear where ideas come from as an employee and if you developed something yourself that you later want to use in your employment, discuss assignment or a licence with your employer.  If it’s too late to do this, avoid litigation if you can, as taking that track without advice is likely to mean losing your claim, as well as your marbles.

Richard Nicholas

Posted by Richard Nicholas
0121 237 3992
rnicholas@brownejacobson.com

VN:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

The Digital Economy Bill – A Boost for Musicians

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

Her Majesty in yesterday’s Queen’s Speech said the following: “My Government will introduce a Bill to ensure communications infrastructure that is fit for the digital age, supports future economic growth, delivers competitive communications and enhances public service broadcasting”.

The Digital Economy Bill will do various things, amongst which will be a change to the law on online copyright infringement – creating duties on Offcom to require ISPs to take action against identified file sharers, and giving Offcom and/or ISPs the power to disconnect persistent file sharers.

Musicians and music lovers alike should welcome this legislation. The detail of how persistent filesharers will, in reality, be banned from the internet remains unclear, as does the extent to which it will prevent unauthorised exchange of copyright materials long-term. History shows that digital pirates are generally one step ahead of those attempting to stop them.

Importantly, however, it strikes a further blow against those who believe it is acceptable to copy, distribute and use copyright materials – such as music or video games – without seeking the permission of the author, or indeed paying the author. The rise in file sharing has brought the music industry to its knees, affecting not only large record labels but also struggling independent musicians. Legislation will not solve this problem, but it will allow us to begin to tackle it.

Only by supporting our creative industry can we ensure it continues to create.

Nick McDonald

Posted by Nick McDonald
0115 976 6198
nmcdonald@brownejacobson.com

VN:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)