Posts Tagged ‘fraudulent misrepresentation’

Selling a company? Know that it’s about to lose a source of revenue?

Thursday, April 28th, 2011

Do you need to tell the (potential) buyer about the future threat to the business? If you want to avoid a claim for misrepresentation you do… or risk unlimited liability.

A case on 20th April this year has confirmed the position at English law that silence (when you know an honest statement is no longer true) can amount to fraudulent misrepresentation.

It’s not the first such case to make this point (as anyone who attends our regular in house lawyers forums will be aware) but it does place the bar higher for sellers of businesses, who must balance the threat to the sale against the (very real) threat of a claim, in respect of which they will not be able to limit liability.

Posted by Richard Nicholas, who specialises in commercial, IT and outsourcing agreements, complex projects for private and public sector clients, collaboration, distribution & agency contracts, e-commerce and consumer law.

Richard Nicholas

Richard Nicholas
0121 237 3992
rnicholas@brownejacobson.com

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

'We can deliver!' – Can these words expose you to unlimited liability?

Friday, January 29th, 2010

If they’re made dishonestly they might…

In particular, if you’re a provider of outsourcing services and make a statement that you:

  • can deliver a project within certain prescribed timescales and    
  • are making this statement having carried out a proper analysis of the work involved

Then, if your customer believes you, you may well find that your contractual limits on liability will not protect you, as one supplier found to their cost in the long awaited decision between BSkyB and EDS this month.

 It was held by the Judge that the statements made by the supplier were not only incorrect but were also dishonest, since the person making them knew them to be wrong.  

This allowed the customer to claim for Fraudulent Misrepresentation (under the Misrepresentation Act 1967).  Since liability for Fraudulent Misrepresentation cannot be limited, when the project went over-budget and missed the deadline, the supplier’s £30 Million cap on liability was ineffective. 

Liability has yet to be decided (and the case may be appealed) but the misleading statements made by the supplier may well mean that it now faces liability of £200 Million or more. 

The lesson for suppliers – if you’re bidding on a project be careful what claims you make about your ability to deliver and never claim to have assessed the risk unless you truly have.  Given the recent history of IT projects delivered late and over budget in the public sector  I suspect there will be a number of customers scanning emails in the light of this case to see what optimistic IT providers might have promised.

Richard Nicholas

Posted by Richard Nicholas
0121 237 3992
rnicholas@brownejacobson.com

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)