<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>law, less ordinary - legal opinions from Browne Jacobson &#187; government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/tag/government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress</link>
	<description>law, less ordinary - legal opinions from Browne Jacobson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Granting concessions</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2012/01/20/granting-concessions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2012/01/20/granting-concessions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gemmai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Authorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu procurement directives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministry of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public service concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public service contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=4234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new ruling by the Court of Appeal has added to the caselaw setting out the differences between public service contracts and public service concessions. In this case, contracts for the provision of bailiff services with the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) were concessions, meaning that the EU procurement directives are not applicable. The court held [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new ruling by the Court of Appeal has added to the caselaw setting out the differences between public service contracts and public service concessions. In this case, contracts for the provision of bailiff services with <a title="granting_concessions" href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/8.html">the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) were concessions</a>, meaning that the EU procurement directives are not applicable.</p>
<p>The court held that even though the MoJ retained considerable control over how the contract was performed and the scope for exploiting the services further by the contractor was extremely limited the fact that the payment of fees under the contract came from third parties (the debtors) and the risks of management and operation of the service transferred to the contractor were enough to make it a service concession.</p>
<p>The court did acknowledge that the facts of this case didn’t fit neatly into the normal descriptions of either public service contracts or concessions meaning that future cases on the same point may end differently.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Anja Beriro</strong>, who specialises in : local authority law, <a title="procurement"href= http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/services/procurement.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&#038;utm_medium=opinions&#038;utm_content=anja_beriro&#038;utm_campaign=procurement">public sector procurements</a>, commercial agreements, projects and shared services; clients: local authority and private sector bodie.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/Anja%20Beriro%202%20USE%20Square.jpg" alt="Anja Beriro" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Anja Beriro<br />
0115 976 6589<br />
<a title="email Anja Beriro" href="mailto:aberiro@brownejacobson.com">aberiro@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2012/01/20/granting-concessions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christmas comes early for card-carrying consumers</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/12/23/christmas-comes-early-for-card-carrying-consumers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/12/23/christmas-comes-early-for-card-carrying-consumers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising & Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charging for using cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu consumer rights directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=4124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Businesses which make consumers “pay for paying” using their card on the internet have been heavily criticised by consumer groups. Consumers find it unfair to be charged (a) more than the cost to the business of processing the transaction (b) per item purchased and (c) without being notified of the charge up front. Today it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Businesses which make consumers “pay for paying” using their card on the internet have been heavily criticised by consumer groups. Consumers find it unfair to be charged (a) more than the cost to the business of processing the transaction (b) per item purchased and (c) without being notified of the charge up front. Today it has been announced that the <a title="card_carrying_customers" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/borrowing/creditcards/8974365/Credit-card-fees-to-be-banned-in-crackdown-on-surcharges.html">Government intends to ban this practice</a>.</p>
<p>This is perhaps a non-story because last week, the EU Consumer Rights Directive came into force. This requires the UK to make a number of changes to consumer law (some positive, some negative) by December 2013 (including such a ban), so that consumer protection is fully harmonised across the EU. But the Government does propose to put a ban in place earlier, in 2012.</p>
<p>To get a PR advantage over slower competitors, businesses might want to make the changes to their terms and conditions and websites before they become mandatory.  Consider it an early Christmas present to your customers!</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Oliver Sweeney</strong>, who specialises in <a title="regulation" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/services/regulatory.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=oliver_sweeney&amp;utm_campaign=regulatory">regulatory matters</a>; including compliance, representation e.g. company prosecutions and public inquiries; transport issues; commercial litigation, including reputation management, contractual litigation and injunctions.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/oliver_sweeney_new_web.jpg" alt="Oliver Sweeney" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Oliver Sweeney<br />
0115 976 6247<br />
<a title="email Oliver Sweeney" href="mailto:osweeney@brownejacobson.com">osweeney@brownejacobson.com</a><br />
<a title="follow me on linkedin" href="http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/oliver-sweeney/2/648/b21"><img style="padding-top: 3px;" title="my linked in profile" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/linkedinsmall.png" alt="" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/12/23/christmas-comes-early-for-card-carrying-consumers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Curriculum changes delayed &#8211; but should they be scrapped altogether?</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/12/20/curriculum-changes-delayed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/12/20/curriculum-changes-delayed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academy conversions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curriculum changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outstanding schools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=4087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government has announced that changes to the curriculum in English, science, maths and I.T. have been pushed back a year &#8211; to autumn 2014. The reason is to allow more time for interested parties to give their views so that a “genuinely word-class education system” can be created. Critics have pointed out that as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government has announced that changes to the curriculum in English, science, maths and I.T. have been pushed back a year &#8211; <a title="curriculum_changes_delayed" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-16248847">to autumn 2014</a>. The reason is to allow more time for interested parties to give their views so that a “genuinely word-class education system” can be created.</p>
<p>Critics have pointed out that as more and more schools convert to academies the proposed changes may be pointless since academies have freedom over their curriculum.</p>
<p>There are <a title="curriculum_changes_delayed" href="http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/leadership/typesofschools/academies/b0069811/open-academies-and-academy-projects-in-development">currently 1,463 academies open</a> (the majority of which are secondaries) and hundreds more academy conversions are in the pipeline. In addition, the government has made it clear that poorly performing schools will be forced to partner-up with outstanding schools and become academies.</p>
<p>If the pace of conversions keeps up, the number of schools affected by the change in curriculum will be few and far between. The government hopes academies will voluntarily adopt the changes come 2014, but will not be able to guarantee this will be the case.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/hayley_roberts_new_web.jpg" alt="Hayley Roberts" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Hayley Roberts<br />
0115 908 4862<br />
<a title="email Hayley Roberts" href="mailto:hroberts@brownejacobson.com">hroberts@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/12/20/curriculum-changes-delayed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation opened for employment tribunal fees</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/12/14/consultation-opened-for-employment-tribunal-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/12/14/consultation-opened-for-employment-tribunal-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment tribunal fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministry of Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=4050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following the government announcing its intention to introduce fees in employment tribunals, today the Ministry of Justice has opened a consultation, inviting tribunal users to comment on the way those fees will be structured. The two options for consideration are: an initial fee of £150-£250 to bring a claim, with an additional fee of £250-1,250 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following the government announcing its intention to introduce fees in employment tribunals, today the <a title="employment_tribunal_fees" href="http://www.justice.gov.uk/consultations/et-fee-charging-regime-cp22-2011.htm">Ministry of Justice has opened a consultation</a>, inviting tribunal users to comment on the way those fees will be structured. The two options for consideration are:</p>
<ul>
<li>an initial fee of £150-£250 to bring a claim, with an additional fee of £250-1,250 if it goes to hearing, with no limit on the maximum award,or</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> a single fee of £200-600 and a £30,000 limit on the maximum award (with the option to pay an additional £1,750 if an award over £30,000 is sought)</li>
</ul>
<p>Last year the tribunal system cost the taxpayer £84 million to run. The primary aim of the fee is to ensure claimants make a contribution towards this cost.  From an employer’s perspective, however, this should also discourage claimants from bringing claims and reduce their expectations of the maximum award that they may obtain if successful.  This in turn should assist employers in recruiting without fear of such claims being brought.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Hayley Prescott</strong>, who specialises in <a title="employment" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/employment.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=hayley_prescott&amp;utm_campaign=employment"> employment</a> law, both contentious and non-contentious, including tribunal claims, unfair dismissal, redundancy, policies and procedures, compromise agreements, contractual issues and general advisory work.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/Hayley%20Prescott%202%20USE%20Full%20Square.jpg" alt="Hayley Prescott" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Hayley Prescott<br />
0115 976 6116<br />
<a title="email Hayley Prescott" href="mailto:hprescott@brownejacobson.com">hprescott@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/12/14/consultation-opened-for-employment-tribunal-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overhaul could result in 10% increase in some school budgets</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/11/21/school-funding-overhaul-could-result-in-10-increase-in-some-schools%e2%80%99-budgets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/11/21/school-funding-overhaul-could-result-in-10-increase-in-some-schools%e2%80%99-budgets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mikef</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition reform of education funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ifs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institute of fiscal studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report from the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) says that though plans to implement a single national funding formula for schools will create winners and losers, the system needs to be more consistent, transparent and responsive. The IFS acknowledges that at present “formulae can be myriad and complex: different local authorities take into account [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A report from the <a title="education_funding_reform" href="http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/5754" target="_blank">Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS)</a> says that though plans to implement a single national funding formula for schools will create winners and losers, the system needs to be more consistent, transparent and responsive. The IFS acknowledges that at present “formulae can be myriad and complex: different local authorities take into account different factors and fund particular types of schools differently”.</p>
<p>The formula must be carefully thought out, with a fair adjustment of secondary to primary school funding, recognition that current deprivation funding (i.e. the pupil premium) is geared strongly towards secondary schools and recognise that some of the most <a title="education_funding_reform" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/nov/18/schools-budget-shakeup" target="_blank">deprived parts of the country ought to receive extra funds</a>.</p>
<p>IFS asserts that any transitional period of less than a decade will involve significant, sustained losses for some schools. With the coalition’s reputation for rapid change in the education system it will be interesting to see whether they follow the IFS’s recommendations on the transitional period.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/hayley_roberts_new_web.jpg" alt="Hayley Roberts" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Hayley Roberts<br />
0115 908 4862<br />
<a title="email Hayley Roberts" href="mailto:hroberts@brownejacobson.com">hroberts@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/11/21/school-funding-overhaul-could-result-in-10-increase-in-some-schools%e2%80%99-budgets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Would Prospective Adopters do if they were PM?</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/11/21/what-would-prospective-adopters-do-if-they-were-pm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/11/21/what-would-prospective-adopters-do-if-they-were-pm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mikef</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adoption services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social care practitioners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treasury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social Care Practitioners and adopters have been invited to share their views about the Treasury&#8217;s &#8220;rapid review&#8221; of adoption services. It certainly is rapid. Some may think the deadline is too short to allow for sufficiently broad range of feedback. The letter is dated 14 November 2011, and asks for feedback on its 24 questions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social Care Practitioners and adopters have been invited to share their views about the Treasury&#8217;s <a title="adoption_review" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/18/11/2011/117791/government-orders-rapid-review-of-adoption.htm" target="_blank">&#8220;rapid review&#8221; of adoption services</a>. It certainly is rapid. Some may think the deadline is too short to allow for sufficiently broad range of feedback.</p>
<p><a title="adoption_review" href="http://www.adoptionuk.org/files/264484/FileName/LettertoProspectiveAdoptersandAdopters.doc" target="_blank">The letter</a> is dated 14 November 2011, and asks for feedback on its 24 questions by Monday 28 November 2011. We are also saddened to see how little publicity this has received.</p>
<p>When there are changes we hope to see them introduced after widespread training, and led by experienced practitioners. If that doesn&#8217;t happen we can expect to see more litigation from adopters, children and their birth families in the future as those Social Workers who have to spearhead changes break new ground.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Sarah Erwin-Jones</strong>, who specialises in <a title="adult services - social care" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/adult_services_-_social_care.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=sarah_erwinjones&amp;utm_campaign=adult_services_-_social_care">social services</a>, the care sector, <a title="education" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_sectors/public_sector/education__skills.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=sarah_erwinjones&amp;utm_campaign=education_skills">education</a> and negotiating legal costs; advises on risk management issues including <a title="data protection" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/data_protection.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=sarah_erwinjones&amp;utm_campaign=data_protection">data protection</a> matters.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/sarah_erwin_new_web.jpg" alt="Sarah Erwin-Jones" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Sarah Erwin-Jones<br />
0115 976 6136<br />
<a title="email Sarah Erwin-Jones" href="mailto:serwin@brownejacobson.com">serwin@brownejacobson.com</a><br />
<a title="follow me on linkedin" href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/sarah-erwin-jones/33/24a/585"><img style="padding-top: 3px;" title="my linked in profile" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/linkedinsmall.png" alt="" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/11/21/what-would-prospective-adopters-do-if-they-were-pm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time to confess all?</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/10/11/time-to-confess-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/10/11/time-to-confess-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mikef</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acute trusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambulance services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browne jacobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duty of candour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily Birkett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government consultation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health consultation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental health services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS standard contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient relationship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient well being]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Health reaffirmed the Government’s commitment to increasing openness within the NHS by launching a consultation which aims to explore how it might impose a contractual ‘duty of candour’ on providers. The consultation proposes to introduce obligations for providers to always be open with patients about incidents where things go wrong into the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department of Health reaffirmed the Government’s commitment to increasing openness within the NHS by launching a consultation which aims to explore how it might impose a contractual ‘duty of candour’ on providers. </p>
<p>The consultation proposes to introduce obligations for providers to always be open with patients about incidents where things go wrong into the NHS Standard Contracts for acute, community, ambulance and mental health services. </p>
<p>Sanctions could include, amongst others, a deduction in the annual contract value, independent investigation or a written apology to the patient from the organisation’s Chief Executive.  </p>
<p>The duty is purported to have the potential to support the development of stronger commissioner-provider relationships and to improve quality. However, it isn’t yet clear how the duty would interact with or improve upon existing duties to let patients know when things go wrong  or whether patients would gain any additional support or direct benefit from the existence of a statutory, as opposed to a non-statutory, duty.</p>
<p>If you would like to contribute to the consultation <a title="time_to_confess" href="http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Liveconsultations/DH_130400" target="_blank">click here</a>.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Emily Birkett</strong>, who specialises in advice to <a title="health" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_sectors/health.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=emily_birkett&amp;utm_campaign=health">NHS bodies </a>; their local authority partners and related organisations in commercial law, contracting, <a title="procurement" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/procurement.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=emily_birkett&amp;utm_campaign=procurement">procurement </a>, <a title="competition" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/competition.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=emily_birkett&amp;utm_campaign=competition">competition </a>governance and all aspects of <a title="primary care" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_sectors/health/primary_care_trusts.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=emily_birkett&amp;utm_campaign=primary_care_trusts">primary care. </a></p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/emily_birkett_new_web.jpg" alt="Emily Birkett" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Emily Birkett<br />
0121 237 3934<br />
<a title="email Emily Birkett" href="mailto:ebirkett@brownejacobson.com">ebirkett@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/10/11/time-to-confess-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Growth in Academies</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/10/10/growth-in-academies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/10/10/growth-in-academies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mikef</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browne jacobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education in England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Richards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student achievement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student attainment Government education initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studio schools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the government, more than 1.2 million pupils are now in education in academies. The 1000th academy to choose academy status has just opened and joins more than 1,300 academies that are already in operation across the country. The pace of change seems to be surpassing even the Department for Education’s expectations. This week [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the government, <a title="growth_in_academies" href="http://www.education.gov.uk/inthenews/inthenews/a00198765/more-than-one-million-children-now-taught-in-academies" target="_blank">more than 1.2 million pupils </a>are now in education in academies. The 1000th academy to choose academy status has just opened and joins more than 1,300 academies that are already in operation across the country. The pace of change seems to be surpassing even the Department for Education’s expectations.</p>
<p>This week the government also announced its plans for stepping up funding into setting up free schools in areas where there are shortages of pupil places.</p>
<p>Pupils in the new models of educational establishments are able to benefit from greater freedoms, the ability to innovate and to raise standards. Ministers hope that the range of schools available now to parents, such as academies, Free Schools and Studio Schools, will help transform the attainment and achievement of pupils in England.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/Laura%20Richards%20USE%20web.jpg" alt="Laura Richards" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Laura Richards<br />
0115 976 6249<br />
<a title="email Laura Richards" href="mailto:lrichards@brownejacobson.com">lrichards@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/10/10/growth-in-academies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tinkering around the edges</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/10/05/tinkering-around-the-edges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/10/05/tinkering-around-the-edges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 16:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mikef</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browne jacobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment tirbunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[length of service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualifying service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom McLaughlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair dismissal claim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government has announced that the length of service needed for the right to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim will increase from one year to two, from April 2012. It claims the move will reduce the number of unfair dismissal claims brought against employers each year by 2,000. The move has been welcomed by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Government has <a title="unfair_dismissa" href="http://nds.coi.gov.uk/content/detail.aspx?NewsAreaId=2&amp;ReleaseID=421449&amp;SubjectId=16&amp;AdvancedSearch=true" target="_blank">announced </a>that the length of service needed for the right to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim will increase from one year to two, from April 2012. It claims the move will reduce the number of unfair dismissal claims brought against employers each year by 2,000. The move has been <a title="unfair_dismissal" href="http://www.cbi.org.uk/ndbs/press.nsf/0363c1f07c6ca12a8025671c00381cc7/0c34539cec8597968025791e004a65be?OpenDocument" target="_blank">welcomed </a>by the CBI, but are unfair dismissal claims by employees with between one and two year’s service really the problem for employers? Of more concern to employers must surely be unfounded allegations of discrimination (for which there is no service requirement), which often require long and costly employment tribunal hearings to defend.</p>
<p>The qualifying period of service for claiming unfair dismissal used to be two years, before it was successfully challenged in Europe in the late 1990’s as being indirectly discriminatory against women. It will be interesting to see if such a challenge is brought following this latest announcement, and whether such a challenge would stand up.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Tom McLaughlin</strong>, who specialises in <a title="employment" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/employment.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=tom_mclaughlin&amp;utm_campaign=employment">contentious and non-contentious employment matters</a> including; contractual issues, unfair dismissal, redundancy and all areas of discrimination.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/Tom%20McLaughlin%20USE%20web.jpg" alt="Tom McLaughlin" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Tom McLaughlin<br />
020 7337 1033<br />
<a title="email Tom McLaughlin" href="mailto:tmclaughlin@brownejacobson.com">tmclaughlin@brownejacobson.com</a><br />
<a title="follow me on linkedin" href="http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/tom-mclaughlin/27/43a/171"><img style="padding-top: 3px;" title="my linked in profile" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/linkedinsmall.png" alt="" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/10/05/tinkering-around-the-edges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The end for the plastic bag…?</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/30/the-end-for-the-plastic-bag%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/30/the-end-for-the-plastic-bag%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mikef</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste & Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Retail Consortium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browne jacobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federation of small businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john griffiths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kassra powles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic carrier bags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supermarket carrier bags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welsh assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welsh environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welsh environment minister]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From 1 October 2011 shoppers in Wales will have to pay 5p for each ‘single use carrier bag’ used in shops. The Welsh Government hopes to match the 90% reduction in single use carrier bags that has been seen in Ireland, which introduced a similar rule 9 years ago. Shopkeepers who do not enforce the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From 1 October 2011 shoppers in Wales will have to pay 5p for each ‘single use carrier bag’ used in shops. The Welsh Government hopes to match the 90% <a title="end_of_plastic_bags" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-15122462" target="_blank">reduction in single use carrier bags </a>that has been seen in Ireland, which introduced a similar rule 9 years ago.</p>
<p>Shopkeepers who do not enforce the charge or fail to keep records face financial penalties. Welsh Environment Minister John Griffiths says the aim is not to penalise shopkeepers but it is about “changing the way people behave and having less of a throwaway society.”</p>
<p>However, the British Retail Consortium thinks the Welsh Government needs to iron out anomalies in the law whilst the Federation of Small Businesses has said not all of its members have received information packs with guidance on compliance with the rules.</p>
<p>This change only applies to Wales, but if successful then it could encourage the other parliaments to follow suit. David Cameron has warned supermarkets to do more to reduce carrier bag use, otherwise they may be banned or a charge implemented.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/Kassra%20Powles%20USE%20web.jpg" alt="Kassra Powles" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Kassra Powles<br />
0115 908 6200<br />
<a title="email Kassra Powles" href="mailto:kpowles@brownejacobson.com">kpowles@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/30/the-end-for-the-plastic-bag%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Positive planning</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/16/positive-planning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/16/positive-planning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Portas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mr Pickles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national planning policy framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sainsbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[town centre developments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Mary Portas squares up to David Cameron over planning reform and its effects on town centres, Mr Pickles should note that it is not planning which is holding up town centre developments but the credit crunch. It is rare to see those “well heeled solicitors” he refers to fighting over town centre schemes, unless [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Mary Portas squares up to David Cameron over planning reform and its effects on town centres, Mr Pickles should note that it is not planning which is holding up town centre developments but the credit crunch. It is rare to see those “well heeled solicitors” he refers to fighting over town centre schemes, unless it involves competition between the likes of Sainsbury and Tesco as at Wolverhampton.</p>
<p>Even so, in one sense the Government is right; more councils need to engage in the process of positive planning rather than being on the defensive against the supermarkets, which is what will happen once the National Planning Policy Framework comes into place early next year. However Mary has a point and I believe that in respect of retail planning a transition period is required to enable councils to move swiftly to put new plans and policies into place for town centres.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Steve Coult</strong>, who specialises in <a title="planning" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/planning.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=steve_coult&amp;utm_campaign=planning">Planning</a> consultancy &#8211; expert witness services and compulsory purchase management based upon extensive experience as Chartered Town Planner and Surveyor.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/steve_coult_new_web.jpg" alt="Steve Coult" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Steve Coult<br />
0115 976 6152<br />
<a title="email Steve Coult" href="mailto:scoult@brownejacobson.com">scoult@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/16/positive-planning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Striking it lucky?</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/16/striking-it-lucky/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/16/striking-it-lucky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mikef</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browne jacobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hutton report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS pension scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension schemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sector pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sector strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sector strike action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria Leybourn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A series of strikes are scheduled as a result of the proposals to increase member contributions to public sector pension schemes The publication of the final Hutton report earlier this year brought with it rumblings of discontentment amongst recipients and future recipients of the various public sector schemes to which it outlined reforms including the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A series of strikes are scheduled as a result of the proposals to increase member contributions to <a title="public_sector_pension_schemes" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14907909">public sector pension schemes </a></p>
<p>The publication of the final <a title="hutton_report" href="http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/indreview_johnhutton_pensions.htm">Hutton report </a>earlier this year brought with it rumblings of discontentment amongst recipients and future recipients of the various public sector schemes to which it outlined reforms including the <a title="NHS_pension_scheme" href="http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Liveconsultations/DH_128710">NHS pension scheme</a></p>
<p>The Government clarified that although it accepted all of Hutton’s 27 recommendations for reform, implementation would only occur following consultation with unions and members. The first consultations have been opened for a number of public sector pension schemes and they relate to increasing member contributions with effect from April 2012.</p>
<p>This consultation is only the first issued in respect of the 27 recommendations and the reaction amongst unions and members to these initial consultations signifies that there could be a lot more strikes ahead. It remains to be seen whether the Government determine that financial pressures and the “need” for reform of the public sector schemes will outweigh the upheaval to public services as a result of the planned strikes.</p>
<p><img title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Victoria Leybourn</strong>, who specialises in advising companies and trustees in all aspects of <a title="pensions" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/pensions.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=victoria_leybourn&amp;utm_campaign=pensions">pensions law</a> and local authorities and contractors on their obligations regarding public sector pension schemes.<br />
<img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/Victoria%20Leybourn%20USE%20web.jpg" alt="Victoria Leybourn" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Victoria Leybourn<br />
0115 976 6160<br />
<a title="email Victoria Leybourn" href="vleybourn@brownejacobson.commailto:vleybourn@brownejacobson.com">vleybourn@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/16/striking-it-lucky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government issues labelling guidance to tackle growing food waste mountain</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/15/government-issues-labelling-guidance-to-tackle-growing-food-waste-mountain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/15/government-issues-labelling-guidance-to-tackle-growing-food-waste-mountain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food & drink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste & Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best before dates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food label dates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local government association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use by dates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government has issued new guidance for the food industry on the use of food label dates amid growing concerns at the amount of food that is wasted each year by UK households. According to the Local Government Association UK consumers threw away £14bn worth of food in 2010. The guidance places greater emphasis on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Government has issued <a title="food_waste" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/8764091/New-rules-scrap-sell-by-date.html">new guidance for the food industry</a> on the use of food label dates amid growing concerns at the amount of food that is wasted each year by UK households.</p>
<p>According to the Local Government Association UK consumers threw away £14bn worth of food in 2010.</p>
<p>The guidance places greater emphasis on ‘use by’ or ‘best before’ dates and discourages the use of “sell by&#8221; and &#8220;display until&#8221; labels which are primarily used for stock control purposes.</p>
<p>The guidance reflects draft EU food regulations which provide only for mandatory use-by dates and omits the requirement for a best before date to be displayed. UK food labelling laws could be much simpler. This guidance is long overdue and over time it will be reflected in UK law. Any measure that reduces red tape for manufacturers and retailers will be welcomed by the industry but companies will have to continue to ensure customers are provided with any relevant details to ensure that the food they consume is safe.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Nina Best</strong>, who specialises in <a title="regulation" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/regulatory.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=nina_best&amp;utm_campaign=regulatory">regulatory matters</a>; entertainment licensing; <a title="advertising and marketing team" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/brands,_advertising__marketin.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=nina_best&amp;utm_campaign=brands">advertising and marketing law</a>; advice and representation on infringement of <a title="food and drink group" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_sectors/private__public_listed_compan/food__drink.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=nina_best&amp;utm_campaign=food">Food Safety</a> Manufacturing Product Regulations.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/nina_best_new_web.jpg" alt="Nina Best" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Nina Best<br />
0115 976 6529<br />
<a title="email nina best" href="mailto:nbest@brownejacobson.com">nbest@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/15/government-issues-labelling-guidance-to-tackle-growing-food-waste-mountain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want to know about future tax changes? Keep polishing your crystal ball!</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/13/want-to-know-about-future-tax-changes-keep-polishing-your-crystal-ball/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/13/want-to-know-about-future-tax-changes-keep-polishing-your-crystal-ball/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50% tax rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edd Balls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Osborne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-budget report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spring budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week (6 September 2011) the chancellor, George Osborne, announced that he will make his autumn statement on 29 November 2011. From 1997 to 2009 this statement took the form of a pre-Budget report – almost a “mini-Budget” -under which initial details of proposed changes to the tax regime were often released ahead of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week (6 September 2011) the chancellor, George Osborne, announced that he will make his <a title="futuure_tax_changes" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14810055">autumn statement on 29 November 2011</a>.</p>
<p>From 1997 to 2009 this statement took the form of a pre-Budget report – almost a “mini-Budget” -under which initial details of proposed changes to the tax regime were often released ahead of the main Spring Budget.</p>
<p>The government is currently under pressure to make tax cuts, with some arguing that the standard rate of <a title="future_tax_changes" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/sep/08/cut-vat-not-50p-tax-ed-balls">VAT should be reduced</a> and others pushing for the 50% “super rate” of income tax to be abolished.</p>
<p>However, in contrast to the pre-Budget reports, the Coalition’s autumn statements focus more on the economy’s current performance and respond to the Office for Budget Responsibility&#8217;s forecasts and so Mr Osborne is unlikely to be giving us a taster of the 2012 Spring Budget in November.</p>
<p>For now, therefore, speculation over future tax changes will continue. Watch this space…</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Beth Dowson</strong>, who specialises in <a title="corporate and real estate tax" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/tax.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=beth_dowson&amp;utm_campaign=tax">taxation aspects</a> of a wide range of property, corporate and commercial matters; provides <a title="corporate and real estate tax" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/tax.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=andrew_noble&amp;utm_campaign=tax">taxation support</a> to other internal departments.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/beth_dowson_new_web.jpg" alt="Beth Dowson" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Beth Dowson<br />
0115 976 6186<br />
<a title="email Beth Dowson" href="mailto:bdowson@brownejacobson.com">bdowson@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/13/want-to-know-about-future-tax-changes-keep-polishing-your-crystal-ball/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personal Injury Referrral fees to be banned</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/09/personal-injury-referrral-fees-to-be-banned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/09/personal-injury-referrral-fees-to-be-banned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal injury claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referral fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the legal aid sentencing and punishment of offenders bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government today confirmed that it will ban referral fees in Personal Injury Claims, though no details have been given regarding implementation. Jack Straw is expected to place a bill proposing a ban before parliament next week, or the Government may choose to act through amendment to The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Government today confirmed that it will <a title="personal_injury_fees" href="http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/press-releases/moj/newsrelease090911a.htm">ban referral fees in Personal Injury Claims</a>, though no details have been given regarding implementation. Jack Straw is expected to place a bill proposing a ban before parliament next week, or the Government may choose to act through amendment to The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill.</p>
<p>The Government hopes to reduce the cost of claims to the public, by curbing the ability of companies to profit from injury claims. Measures which move profits to another point in the claims process or which can be circumvented by new business models will be ineffective. The challenge will be to ensure the measures are comprehensive and robust.</p>
<p>Ultimately, profiteering from injury claims can only be addressed by government and the Ccourts taking control of conduct and the costs awarded to parties in personal injury litigation.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by James Arrowsmith</strong>, who specialises in <a title="insurance claims" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_sectors/insurance.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=james_arrowsmith&amp;utm_campaign=insurance"> high value personal injury claims</a>, extensive experience of claims relating to head injuries and serious bodily injury, psychiatric damage and injuries to children.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/james_arrowsmith_new_web.jpg" alt="James Arrowsmith" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">James Arrowsmith<br />
0121 237 3981<br />
<a title="email James Arrowsmith" href="mailto:jarrowsmith@brownejacobson.com">jarrowsmith@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/09/personal-injury-referrral-fees-to-be-banned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employment tribunal claims fall</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/02/employment-tribunal-claims-fall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/02/employment-tribunal-claims-fall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age discrimination claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment tribunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part-time workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1 September 2011 the Government announced that the number of employment tribunal claims had fallen by 8 per cent this year compared to 2010. This will be welcomed by employers, who have seen the amount of claims rise dramatically during the recent economic downturn (claims rose by 56 per cent in 2010). However, it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1 September 2011 the Government announced that the number of <a title="tribunal_claims_fail" href="http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/publications/statistics-and-data/mojstats/employment-trib-stats-april-march-2010-11.pdf">employment tribunal claims had fallen by 8 per cent</a> this year compared to 2010.</p>
<p>This will be welcomed by employers, who have seen the amount of claims rise dramatically during the recent economic downturn (claims rose by 56 per cent in 2010).</p>
<p>However, it is not all good news.</p>
<p>Age discrimination claims have risen by 32 per cent. This may be as a result of employers struggling with changes to how and when employees can be retired and is something all employers need to handle with care and claims by part-time workers claiming less favourable treatment have nearly tripled. This is a stark reminder that part-time workers are entitled to the same benefits (pro rata) as full time employees.</p>
<p>Employers should also note that the number of claims is still significantly above 2009 levels, indicating that employees are very aware of their rights and are not afraid to involve the tribunal to enforce them.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/ben_standing_new_web.jpg" alt="Ben Standing" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Ben Standing<br />
0121 237 4563<br />
<a title="email Ben Standing" href="mailto:bstanding@brownejacobson.com">bstanding@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/09/02/employment-tribunal-claims-fall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New challenges, new chances: Further education reform proposals</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/08/18/new-challenges-new-chances-further-education-reform-proposals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/08/18/new-challenges-new-chances-further-education-reform-proposals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Further Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business secretary Vince Cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FE loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[further education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[further education reforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following the publication of two strategy documents in November 2010, the government has this week (16 August 2011) launched three consultation papers setting out the next phase of FE reform. This consultation process is seeking views on how best to implement the governments latest proposals, including; proposals to develop the shape of the sector, provide [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following the publication of two strategy documents in November 2010, the government has this week (16 August 2011) <a title="further_education_reform" href="http://www.bis.gov.uk/Consultations/fe-and-skills-new-challenges-new-chances">launched three consultation papers</a> setting out the next phase of FE reform.</p>
<p>This consultation process is seeking views on how best to implement the governments latest proposals, including; proposals to develop the shape of the sector, provide greater freedom and flexibilities, implement FE loans to encourage shared responsibility, simplify the funding system and review and improve literacy and numeracy provision for adults.</p>
<p>Business Secretary Vince Cable, said  &#8220;With better informed, more empowered learners and providers freed from petty bureaucracy, post-school adult learning will take its rightful place at the heart of our communities.” The consultation closes on Friday 21 October so whether this noble statement becomes reality once feedback has been collated remains to be seen.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Richard Cox</strong>, who specialises in <a title="corporate finance" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/corporate_finance.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=richard_cox&amp;utm_campaign=corporate_finance">corporate transactions</a> and advises <a title="further education" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_sectors/public_sector/education__skills/further_education.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=richard_cox&amp;utm_campaign=further_education">colleges</a> on numerous matters including joint ventures and partnerships, college mergers and funding disputes.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/richard_cox_new_web.jpg" alt="Richard Cox" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Richard Cox<br />
0115 976 6135<br />
<a title="email Richard Cox" href="mailto:rcox@brownejacobson.com">rcox@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/08/18/new-challenges-new-chances-further-education-reform-proposals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First cull of “crackers” regulations</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/07/29/first-cull-of-%e2%80%9ccrackers%e2%80%9d-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/07/29/first-cull-of-%e2%80%9ccrackers%e2%80%9d-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Tape Challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vince Cable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday the Business Secretary Vince Cable announced proposals in relation to the first results from the Red Tape Challenge. The Government plans to scrap or simplify around 160 out of the 257 regulations reviewed in relation to retail firms. The proposals include: removing the requirement of alcohol licences to sell chocolate liqueurs reducing the age [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday the Business Secretary <a title="crackers_regulations" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14320470">Vince Cable</a> announced <a title="crackers_regulations" href="http://nds.coi.gov.uk/content/Detail.aspx?ReleaseID=420597&amp;NewsAreaID=2&amp;utm_">proposals</a> in relation to the first results from the Red Tape Challenge.  The Government plans to scrap or simplify around 160 out of the 257 regulations reviewed in relation to retail firms.</p>
<p>The proposals include:</p>
<ul>
<li> removing the requirement of alcohol licences to sell chocolate liqueurs</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> reducing the age limit to buy Christmas crackers from 16 to 12</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> removing rules relating to the safety of pencils, prams and hood cords</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> removing various pieces of antiquated legislation</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> removing various specific burdens identified by businesses such as the requirement on retailers to notify TV Licensing about TV sales</li>
</ul>
<p>The Governments efforts to reduce the regulatory burden should be applauded.  However a lot of the changes announced are relatively minor and will have little tangible impact on many firms.  This is not an invitation to businesses to be any less vigilant in their regulatory compliance.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Fiona Carter</strong>, who specialises in <a title="regulation" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/regulatory.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=fiona_carter&amp;utm_campaign=regulatory">commercial regulation</a>, compliance advice and investigations; is head of Browne Jacobson&#8217;s <a title="advertising and marketing team" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/brands,_advertising__marketin.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=fiona_carter&amp;utm_campaign=brands">advertising and marketing team</a> and <a title="food and drink group" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_sectors/private__public_listed_compan/food__drink.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=fiona_carter&amp;utm_campaign=food">food and drink group</a>.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/fiona_carter_new_web.jpg" alt="Fiona Carter" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Fiona Carter<br />
0115 976 6224<br />
<a title="email fiona carter" href="mailto:fcarter@brownejacobson.com">fcarter@brownejacobson.com</a><br />
<a title="follow me on linkedin" href="http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/fiona-carter/b/664/1b0"><img style="padding-top: 3px;" title="my linked in profile" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/linkedinsmall.png" alt="" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/07/29/first-cull-of-%e2%80%9ccrackers%e2%80%9d-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are disruptive students about to increase?</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/07/29/are-disruptive-students-about-to-increase/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/07/29/are-disruptive-students-about-to-increase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department for Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DFE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Gibb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pupil exclusions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teachers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department for Education (“DfE”) yesterday published statistics for 2009/2010 in relation to the number of pupil exclusions. The statistics show that 5,740 pupils were excluded permanently from primary, secondary and special schools during this period with there being as many as 331,380 fixed period exclusions. The DfE calculate that 900 children a day are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department for Education (“DfE”) yesterday <a title="disruptive_students" href="http://www.education.gov.uk/a00192714/school-exclusion-statistics-for-200910">published statistics</a> for 2009/2010 in relation to the number of pupil exclusions.  The statistics show that 5,740 pupils were excluded permanently from primary, secondary and special schools during this period with there being as many as 331,380 <a title="disruptive_students" href="http://www.education.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s001016/index.shtml">fixed period exclusions</a>.  The DfE calculate that 900 children a day are suspended from school for abuse and assault.</p>
<p>The Coalition government has pledged to improve behaviour and academic standards and in response to the statistics, Nick Gibb has expressed concern that weak discipline remains a significant problem in schools.  However, in light of the Education Bill, which will make it easier for head teachers to exclude disruptive students and give teachers increased powers to search students, we are likely to see a spike in these statistics come 2011/2012.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Dai Durbridge</strong>, who specialises safeguarding of children and vulnerable adults in <a title="education" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_sectors/public_sector/education__skills.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=dai_durbridge&amp;utm_campaign=education_skills">education</a>, <a title="social care" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/adult_services_-_social_care.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=dai_durbridge&amp;utm_campaign=social_care">social care </a> and health settings; defending claims against education, social care and health providers.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/dai_durbridge_new_web.jpg" alt="Dai Durbridge" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Dai Durbridge<br />
0115 976 6578<br />
<a title="email Dai Durbridge" href="mailto:ddurbridge@brownejacobson.com">ddurbridge@brownejacobson.com</a><br />
<a title="follow me on linkedin" href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dai-durbridge/31/501/86"><img style="padding-top: 3px;" title="my linked in profile" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/linkedinsmall.png" alt="" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/07/29/are-disruptive-students-about-to-increase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should we tolerate the failure of Southern Cross?</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/07/11/should-we-tolerate-the-failure-of-southern-cross/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/07/11/should-we-tolerate-the-failure-of-southern-cross/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[care homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open public services white paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Cross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voluntary sector]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The landlords of Southern Cross have refused to re-negotiate rent commitments, effectively pulling the plug on the company. The private sector’s reputation as a reliable provider of healthcare services takes another blow. The timing is ironic, with the government unveiling today its Open Public Services White Paper. The talk is all about giving more choice [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The landlords of <a title="southern_cross" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14102750">Southern Cross</a> have refused to re-negotiate rent commitments, effectively pulling the plug on the company. The private sector’s reputation as a reliable provider of healthcare services takes another blow.</p>
<p>The timing is ironic, with the government unveiling today its Open Public Services White Paper. The talk is all about giving more choice to the consumer. The focus will be on where the alternative providers will come from to make such choices a reality. The government is highlighting the role of the Big Society, and playing up the opportunities for the voluntary sector.</p>
<p>However, for many these reforms need the private sector too, even though that will bring with it a need to make profit. In turn that needs the private sector to showcase its ability to provide efficient and reliable services. The government must be wishing ardently for an orderly transfer of Southern Cross&#8217; homes, with minimal closures and a clear maintenance of quality standards. The future of public services needs it.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/Laura%20Richards%20USE%20web.jpg" alt="Laura Richards" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Laura Richards<br />
0115 976 6249<br />
<a title="email Laura Richards" href="mailto:lrichards@brownejacobson.com">lrichards@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/07/11/should-we-tolerate-the-failure-of-southern-cross/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pensions strike &#8211; a dispute with the government, a headache for the school</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/06/30/pensions-strike-a-dispute-with-the-government-a-headache-for-the-school/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/06/30/pensions-strike-a-dispute-with-the-government-a-headache-for-the-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Gove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension reforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[picket lines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strike action]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today ATL and NUT take action against the government&#8217;s proposed pension reforms. Picket lines are in place and cars are already beeping horns in support. It is, however, not the government who has to deal with the consequence of the strike but individual schools. Although Michael Gove has hinted at ways to keep schools open, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today ATL and NUT take action against the government&#8217;s proposed pension reforms.  Picket lines are in place and cars are already beeping horns in support.  It is, however, not the government who has to deal with the consequence of the strike but individual schools.</p>
<p>Although Michael Gove has hinted at <a title="pensions_strike" href="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/06/28/teachers%e2%80%99-strike-gove-backs-parent-volunteers/">ways to keep schools open</a>, reports say that <a title="pensions_strike" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13967580">one third will be closed</a> with another third partially affected It is extremely difficult for schools to safely remain open.  Not knowing which staff are in which union means that schools generally have no way of knowing who will be on strike.  With strict rules preventing the use of agency staff to cover lessons, many Head Teachers and Governors are forced to a position where they have no option but to close the school.  With no clear end to this dispute, schools may look to more innovative (but time consuming) ways to keep schools open in the future.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Heather Bragg</strong>, who specialises in <a title="employment" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/employment.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=heather_bragg&amp;utm_campaign=employment"> contentious and non-contentious employment matters</a> including; contractual issues, unfair dismissal, redundancy and all areas of discrimination.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/heather_bragg_143x155.jpg" alt="Heather Bragg" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Heather Bragg<br />
0115 976 6553<br />
<a title="email Heather Bragg" href="mailto:hbragg@brownejacobson.com">hbragg@brownejacobson.com</a><br />
<a title="follow me on linkedin" href="http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/heather-bragg/15/b51/955"><img style="padding-top: 3px;" title="my linked in profile" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/linkedinsmall.png" alt="" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/06/30/pensions-strike-a-dispute-with-the-government-a-headache-for-the-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green light for public sector pensions reform?</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/06/28/green-light-for-public-sector-pensions-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/06/28/green-light-for-public-sector-pensions-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danny Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hutton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension reforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sector pension scheme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=3089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government has recently announced specific proposals regarding the public sector pensions’ arena. Danny Alexander confirmed in a speech on 16th June that the government’s proposals for members of public sector pension schemes at present comprise an increase in member contributions, an increase in members’ normal retirement ages and a career average structure for public [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government has recently announced specific proposals regarding the public sector pensions’ arena.</p>
<p>Danny Alexander confirmed in a <a title="persions_reform" href="http://www.professionalpensions.com/professional-pensions/news/2079939/danny-alexander-public-sector-pensions-speech">speech</a> on 16th June that the government’s proposals for members of public sector pension schemes at present comprise an increase in member contributions, an increase in members’ normal retirement ages and a career average structure for public sector schemes going forwards.</p>
<p>Although Alexander’s speech is consistent with some of <a title="pensions_reform" href="http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/indreview_johnhutton_pensions.htm">Hutton’s 27 recommendations</a> in his final report published earlier this year, it does not seem to be consistent with the government’s announcement in this year’s budget which confirmed that although the government endorsed Hutton’s recommendations there would be a period of consultation in order to establish how Hutton’s proposals would be implemented.</p>
<p>It seems, for the moment, that we are still waiting for the flesh to be put on the bones of Hutton’s recommendations.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Victoria Leybourn</strong>, who specialises in advising companies and trustees in all aspects of <a title="pensions" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/pensions.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=victoria_leybourn&amp;utm_campaign=pensions"> pensions law</a> and local authorities and contractors on their obligations regarding public sector pension schemes.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/Victoria%20Leybourn%20USE%20web.jpg" alt="Victoria Leybourn" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Victoria Leybourn<br />
0115 976 6160<br />
<a title="email Victoria Leybourn" href="mailto:vleybourn@brownejacobson.com">vleybourn@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/06/28/green-light-for-public-sector-pensions-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adult safeguarding boards get legal footing</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/05/20/adult-safeguarding-boards-get-legal-footing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/05/20/adult-safeguarding-boards-get-legal-footing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 15:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adult safeguarding boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[care services minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local safeguarding childrens' boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Burstow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=2875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Burstow the Care Services Minister has announced that as part of the governments review on adult social care, Adult Safeguarding Boards (ASB&#8217;s) will now be mandatory and will be placed on a statutory footing. ASB&#8217;s are made up of key agencies including social services, police, heath and other groups involved in the protection of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="legal_footing" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2011/05/16/116822/adult-safeguarding-boards-to-be-put-on-statutory-footing.htm">Paul Burstow the Care Services Minister</a> has announced that as part of the governments review on adult social care, Adult Safeguarding Boards (ASB&#8217;s) will now be mandatory and will be placed on a statutory footing. ASB&#8217;s are made up of key agencies including social services, police, heath and other groups involved in the protection of vulnerable adults.</p>
<p>It is intended that the ASBs will provide vital leadership and improve the level of protection afforded to vulnerable adults in much the same way as Local Safeguarding Children’s Boards do for children.  To improve consistency across the country, the government has also laid down the <a title="legal_footing " href="http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_126748">six guiding principles</a> of empowerment, protection, prevention, proportionality, partnership and accountability which should inform local arrangements and govern the actions of the ASB&#8217;s.</p>
<p>This measure will help address concerns that the safeguarding of vulnerable adults comes a distant second place when measured against the provision, law, guidance and support aimed at children.  Getting ASBs on a statutory footing is a strong step in progressing the vulnerable adult agenda.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Dai Durbridge</strong>, who specialises safeguarding of children and vulnerable adults in <a title="education" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_sectors/public_sector/education__skills.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=dai_durbridge&amp;utm_campaign=education_skills">education</a>, <a title="social care" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/adult_services_-_social_care.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=dai_durbridge&amp;utm_campaign=social_care">social care </a> and health settings; defending claims against education, social care and health providers.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/dai_durbridge_new_web.jpg" alt="Dai Durbridge" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Dai Durbridge<br />
0115 976 6578<br />
<a title="email Dai Durbridge" href="mailto:ddurbridge@brownejacobson.com">ddurbridge@brownejacobson.com</a><br />
<a title="follow me on linkedin" href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dai-durbridge/31/501/86"><img style="padding-top: 3px;" title="my linked in profile" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/linkedinsmall.png" alt="" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/05/20/adult-safeguarding-boards-get-legal-footing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wolf report on vocational education gets government backing</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/05/13/wolf-report-on-vocational-education-gets-government-backing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/05/13/wolf-report-on-vocational-education-gets-government-backing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 13:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professor Wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University technical colleges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vocational training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolf report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=2856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday the Government published its response to professor Wolf’s report on vocational education. The Government has endorsed all of Professor Wolf’s recommendations and has committed to ensuring that every student studies only the best vocational qualifications to ensure that they can progress into either higher education or employment. The Government have also pledged its commitment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday the Government published its response to <a title="wolf_report" href="http://www.education.gov.uk/inthenews/inthenews/a0077253/government-publishes-response-to-the-wolf-review-of-vocational-education">professor Wolf’s report</a> on vocational education.  The Government has endorsed all of Professor Wolf’s recommendations and has committed to ensuring that every student studies only the best vocational qualifications to ensure that they can progress into either higher education or employment.</p>
<p>The Government have also pledged its commitment to the creation of further University Technical Colleges (“UTC”), something which has been welcomed by <a title="wolf_report" href="http://www.utcolleges.org/news/lord-baker-comments-on-government-response-to-wolf-review" target="_blank">Lord Baker</a> who has been the champion of growth in this area for some time.</p>
<p>UTCs are unique in that they offer full-time technically-orientated courses for 14-19 year olds.  They are designed to provide opportunities for young people to integrate academic study with practical learning, studying core GCSEs alongside technical qualifications.  UTCs are therefore now clearly viewed by the Government as the vehicle through which vocational education can deliver clear progression into higher education or further learning in work.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Katie Michelon</strong>, who specialises in <a title="legal advice to schools, colleges and local authorities" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_sectors/public_sector/education__skills.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=katie_michelon&amp;utm_campaign=education"> education law advice to schools, colleges and LEAs</a>, including commercial advice on education sector projects such as <a title="academies" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_sectors/public_sector/education__skills/academies.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=mark_blois&amp;utm_campaign=education"> academies</a>, <a title="trust schools" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_sectors/public_sector/education__skills/trust_schools.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=mark_blois&amp;utm_campaign=education"> trust schools</a> and federations.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/Katie%20Michelon_110x110.jpg" alt="Katie Michelon" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Katie Michelon<br />
0115 976 6189<br />
<a title="email Katie Michelon" href="mailto:kmichelon@brownejacobson.com">kmichelon@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/05/13/wolf-report-on-vocational-education-gets-government-backing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultations open on school funding</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/04/15/consultations-open-on-school-funding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/04/15/consultations-open-on-school-funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school funding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=2746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week has seen the Government launch two consultations. The main consultation focuses on developing a new funding framework for schools, with the supplemental consultation focusing on Academy funding for the academic year 2012/13. The consultations are running alongside each other and close on 25 May 2011. The Government proposes to consult on more detailed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week has seen the Government launch two consultations.  The main consultation focuses on developing a new <a title="school_funding" href="&lt;img class=&quot;alignnone size-full wp-image-1206&quot; title=&quot;talk_to_us2&quot; src=&quot;http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;106&quot; height=&quot;18&quot; /&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/hannah_bramhall_new_web.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Hannah Bramhall&quot; width=&quot;55&quot; height=&quot;55&quot; /&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;&quot;&gt;Hannah Bramhall0121 237 4563&lt;a title=&quot;email Hannah Bramhall&quot; href=&quot;mailto:hbramhall@brownejacobson.com&quot;&gt;hbramhall@brownejacobson.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;">funding framework for schools</a>, with the supplemental consultation focusing on Academy funding for the academic year 2012/13.  The consultations are running alongside each other and close on 25 May 2011.  The Government proposes to consult on more detailed plans later this year.</p>
<p>The current system means that there are massive regional variations on the funding schools receive per pupil.  The <a title="school_funding" href="http://www.egovmonitor.com/node/41702">Government seeks to introduce a funding system</a> which distributes the £35 billion budget fairly among pupils and which is not dependent on where they live.</p>
<p>The Academy funding consultation invites views on three proposed funding options in an attempt to reform the current system which the government believes lacks transparency, is prone to error and is administratively inefficient.</p>
<p>As with any redistribution of wealth, there will be winners and losers and we will await with interest the more detailed proposals later this year.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/hannah_bramhall_new_web.jpg" alt="Hannah Bramhall" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Hannah Bramhall<br />
0121 237 4563<br />
<a title="email Hannah Bramhall" href="mailto:hbramhall@brownejacobson.com">hbramhall@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/04/15/consultations-open-on-school-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Academies conversion now open to all schools as total passes 600</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/04/15/academies-conversion-now-open-to-all-schools-as-total-passes-600/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/04/15/academies-conversion-now-open-to-all-schools-as-total-passes-600/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ofsted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=2743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than 600 schools are now academies (compared to 203 in May 2010), with nearly 500 waiting to convert having already applied to the Department for Education. Nearly 550 secondary schools are now academies, representing 16.5% of secondary schools. Until now, conversion was open only to schools judged by Ofsted to be Outstanding or Good [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than <a title="academies_conversion" href="http://www.education.gov.uk/inthenews/pressnotices/a0076515/more-than-600-academies-are-now-open-and-even-more-schools-offered-chance-to-apply">600 schools are now academies</a> (compared to 203 in May 2010), with nearly 500 waiting to convert having already applied to the Department for Education. Nearly 550 secondary schools are now academies, representing 16.5% of secondary schools.</p>
<p>Until now, conversion was open only to schools judged by Ofsted to be Outstanding or Good with Outstanding Features (which have been able to convert in their own right) and other schools if applying as part of wider chains, supported by strong schools.</p>
<p>However, in response to demand from other mainstream and special schools wishing to become stand-alone academies, the Government will now consider applications from any school that can make a compelling case for converting to academy status. Criteria include exam performance over the last three years, and comparison with local and national exam performance.</p>
<p>It is clear that academy status is so far very popular amongst schools, which, it would appear, consider the greater freedoms promised by the Government to be a great incentive.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1206" title="talk_to_us2" src="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/talk_to_us2.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="18" /></p>
<p><strong>Posted by Chris Emm</strong>, who specialises in commercial <a title="property" href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/property.aspx?utm_source=lawlessordinary&amp;utm_medium=opinions&amp;utm_content=chris_emm&amp;utm_campaign=property">property</a> work primarily acting for local authorities and also deals with development and commercial freehold and leasehold matters.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/chris_emm_new_web.jpg" alt="Chris Emm" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-left: 8px; margin-top: 0px;">Chris Emm<br />
0115 908 4112<br />
<a title="email Chris Emm" href="mailto:cemm@brownejacobson.com">cemm@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2011/04/15/academies-conversion-now-open-to-all-schools-as-total-passes-600/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Academies Act passes into law</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/07/29/academies-act-passes-into-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/07/29/academies-act-passes-into-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=1255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Academies Act passed into law earlier this week, paving the way for hundreds of schools to become academies. The government has been criticised for rushing the legislation through Parliament using procedures usually reserved for national emergencies. Christine Blower, general secretary of the NUT, has said, &#8220;Whatever people&#8217;s views on academies may be, by by-passing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Academies Act passed into law earlier this week, paving the way for hundreds of schools to become academies. <a title="Academies_act_passes_into_law" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-10664722">The government has been criticised for rushing the legislation through Parliament</a> using procedures usually reserved for national emergencies. Christine Blower, general secretary of the NUT, has said, &#8220;Whatever people&#8217;s views on academies may be, by by-passing the usual democratic process, the legitimate and essential right to debate such an important issue is removed&#8221;. However, schools that want to become academies will welcome the swiftness of the legislation, which means that they can proceed quickly to become academies and obtain the freedoms associated with conversion.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; padding: 2px 2px 10px 2px; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/mark_blois_new_web.jpg" alt="Mark Blois" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; margin-left: 8px;">Posted by Mark Blois<br />
0115 976 6087<br />
<a title="email mark blois" href="mailto:mblois@brownejacobson.com">mblois@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/07/29/academies-act-passes-into-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No anti-junk food laws in exchange for campaign funding</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/07/09/no-anti-junk-food-laws-in-exchange-for-campaign-funding-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/07/09/no-anti-junk-food-laws-in-exchange-for-campaign-funding-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising & Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Monday, the coalition government asked its marketing departments to plan for spending cuts of up to 40% to their advertising budgets.  Yesterday, the health secretary, Andrew Lansley gave an insight into how the government sees that businesses can help keep important marketing campaigns alive.  Lansley explained that beer companies, confectionary firms and crisp-makers will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday, the coalition government asked its marketing departments to plan for <a title="No_antijunk_food_laws" href="http://www.marketingweek.co.uk/sectors/industry/government/government-departments-prepare-to-cut-spending-by-40/3015407.article">spending cuts of up to 40% to their advertising budgets</a>. </p>
<p>Yesterday, the health secretary, Andrew Lansley gave an insight into how the government sees that businesses can help keep important marketing campaigns alive. </p>
<p>Lansley explained that beer companies, confectionary firms and crisp-makers will be asked to fund the government&#8217;s Change4Life campaign; an advertising campaign that aims to persuade people to switch to a healthier lifestyle. In return, Lansley has promised that <a title="No_antijunk_food_laws" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/jul/07/no-anti-junk-food-laws#start-of-comments">these companies will not face new legislation</a> that was to outlaw excessively fatty, sugary and salty food. </p>
<p>Whilst this is an innovative way of keeping an important government campaign alive, the public don t always realise that the majority of restrictions on food are imposed by mandatory implementation of European Regulations. </p>
<p>Is the government indulging in soft sell &#8211; or is this a promise Lansley can keep?</p>
<p><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999; padding: 2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/fiona_carter_new_web.jpg" alt="Fiona Carter" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; margin-left: 8px;margin-top:0px;">Posted by Fiona Carter<br />
0115 976 6224<br />
<a title="email fiona carter" href="mailto:fcarter@brownejacobson.com">fcarter@brownejacobson.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.brownejacobson.com/your_needs/our_a-z_services/brands,_advertising__marketin.aspx?utm_source=blog&#038;utm_medium=opinions&#038;utm_campaign=resources" title="visit our brands web page">find out more about us</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/07/09/no-anti-junk-food-laws-in-exchange-for-campaign-funding-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Total Place: Con-Dem (ned)?</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/05/12/total-place-con-dem-ned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/05/12/total-place-con-dem-ned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 14:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Browne Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Total Place]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brownejacobson.wordpress.com/?p=699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following days of extensive political wrangling this morning sees the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats celebrate a historic new partnership and signifies the start to a significant shake up in the way public services are delivered as the new coalition Government announces the acceleration of £6bn of public spending cuts. Prior to the General Election both [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following days of extensive political wrangling this morning sees the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats celebrate a historic new partnership and signifies the start to a significant shake up in the way public services are delivered as the new coalition Government announces the acceleration of <a title="Total_place_con_dem" href="http://www.publicpropertyuk.com/2010/05/12/cameron-gets-green-light-for-6bn-savings/">£6bn of public spending cuts</a>.</p>
<p>Prior to the General Election both the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats publicly declared their commitment to supporting the development of further integration between public sector organisations.</p>
<p>Whether the new Government will choose to achieve these cuts by building on the <a title="Total_place_con_dem" href="http://www.localleadership.gov.uk/totalplace/">Total Place </a>agenda developed by Labour over the last twelve months, which supports a ‘whole system approach’ to the commissioning and delivery of public services, or whether it will seek to attain short term savings without realising any widespread public sector reform remains to be seen. What is clear is that change is on the horizon and it’s likely to be big.</p>
<p><img style="float:left;border:1px solid #999999;border-right:2px solid #999999;border-bottom:2px solid #999999;padding:2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/emily_birkett_new_web.jpg" alt="Emily Birkett" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float:left;margin-left:8px;">Posted by Emily Birkett<br />
0121 237 3934<br />
<a title="email email birkett" href="mailto:ebirkett@brownejacobson.com">ebirkett@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/05/12/total-place-con-dem-ned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parent Power</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/02/24/parent-power/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/02/24/parent-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Browne Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government has announced plans to allow parents to vote to change a school&#8217;s leadership where there is significant dissatisfaction locally. In line with Labour&#8217;s Accredited Schools Group/Provider initiative, parents would be able to choose from a list of accredited organisations to take over running the school. Gordon Brown promised parents &#8220;a strong voice and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Government has announced plans to allow <a title="Parent_power" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/8528855.stm">parents to vote to change a school&#8217;s leadership</a> where there is significant dissatisfaction locally. In line with Labour&#8217;s Accredited Schools Group/Provider initiative, parents would be able to choose from a list of accredited organisations to take over running the school. Gordon Brown promised parents &#8220;a strong voice and real power&#8221;.</p>
<p>Comparisons with the Conservative&#8217;s education policy &#8211; they want to make it easier for parents to set up new schools &#8211; will no doubt be rife. Ed Balls himself was quick to argue that while the Tory policy requires &#8220;busy working parents&#8221; to set up their own schools if they are not happy with their local state school, the Government&#8217;s proposals enable parents to &#8220;demand change and get a new and quality-guaranteed provider&#8221;.</p>
<p>It seems to be becoming rather trendy for political parties to drop the &#8220;P&#8221; word into their education manifestos. It will be interesting to see whether this dedication to parent power will run out of steam following the General Election.</p>
<p><img style="float:left;border:1px solid #999999;border-right:2px solid #999999;border-bottom:2px solid #999999;padding:2px 2px 10px;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/mark_blois_new_web.jpg" alt="Mark Blois" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float:left;margin-left:8px;">Posted by Mark Blois<br />
0115 976 6087<br />
<a title="email mark blois" href="mailto:mblois@brownejacobson.com">mblois@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/02/24/parent-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

