<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>law, less ordinary - legal opinions from Browne Jacobson &#187; Legal Expense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/tag/legal-expense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress</link>
	<description>law, less ordinary - legal opinions from Browne Jacobson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:26:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jackson review takes centre stage again</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/07/26/jackson-review-takes-centre-stage-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/07/26/jackson-review-takes-centre-stage-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Litigation Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jackson review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Expense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=1234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government has announced a consultation on implementing the recommendations outlined in Lord Justice Jackson’s review of civil litigation costs. The main thrust of this will be to review CFAs and as to whether they are the best way of achieving justice with the current level of success fees and the way in which ATE [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Jackson_review" href="http://www.postonline.co.uk/post/news/1724660/government-outlines-jackson-review-implementation-plans">The Government has announced a consultation on implementing the recommendations outlined in Lord Justice Jackson’s review of civil litigation costs.</a></p>
<p>The main thrust of this will be to review CFAs and as to whether they are the best way of achieving justice with the current level of success fees and the way in which ATE works.</p>
<p>It is reassuring that the Government is looking at proposals for fixed costs on the fast track and has recognised the unique problems associated with clinical negligence claims. However it has left us in the dark when it comes to non personal injury claims and legal expenses insurance.</p>
<p>It is important the Government clarifies how this will be combined with other measures such as the Lord Young report and the LSB review on referral fees if it seriously wants the industry to engage fully in the debate.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; padding: 2px 2px 10px 2px; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/nichola_evans_110x110.jpg" alt="" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; margin-left: 8px;">Posted by Nichola Evans<br />
0207 337 1019<br />
<a title="email nichola evans" href="mailto:nevans@brownejacobson.com">nevans@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/07/26/jackson-review-takes-centre-stage-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

