The case of Fortune v Roe has re-visited the question of success fees and what the correct success fee ought to be if certain risks are removed from the litigation.
In this case the Claimant had been involved in a very serious car accident but by the time she entered into a CFA liability had been admitted and judgment entered for damages to be assessed. The CFA provided for a success fee of 100%. Sir Robert Nelson found that there was no risk to the recovery of charges to the solicitor and there could not be said to be a litigation risk. Therefore the only risk was of receiving no costs after beating a Part 36 offer and the success fee would represent compensation for that. As a result the court found that a success fee of 100% could not be justified and the figure of 20%, awarded by the first instance judge was upheld.
This shows the importance of getting the risk assessment on the CFA right. If it’s not an accurate assessment then we can expect the courts to get involved – with cost consequences!
![]()
Posted by Nichola Evans, who specialises in professional indemnity work, directors and officers, legal expenses insurance, conditional fee agreements and after the event insurance and commercial litigation.

Nichola Evans
020 7337 1019
nevans@brownejacobson.com



