<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>law, less ordinary - legal opinions from Browne Jacobson &#187; Part-time Workers Directive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/tag/part-time-workers-directive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress</link>
	<description>law, less ordinary - legal opinions from Browne Jacobson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:26:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Justice for judges</title>
		<link>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/07/28/justice-for-judges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/07/28/justice-for-judges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Part-time Workers Directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/?p=1240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court has today referred a case against the Ministry of Justice concerning its refusal to grant pensions to thousands of part-time judges to the European Court of Justice. Employment barristers at Cloisters, instructed by Browne Jacobson, are arguing that retired Recorder (part-time judge) Dermod O’Brien QC should be entitled to a judicial pension [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Justice_for_judges" href="http://www.professionalpensions.com/professional-pensions/news/1725141/ecj-rule-judges-benefit-entitlement">The Supreme Court has today referred a case against the Ministry of Justice concerning its refusal to grant pensions to thousands of part-time judges to the European Court of Justice</a>.</p>
<p>Employment barristers at Cloisters, instructed by Browne Jacobson, are arguing that retired Recorder (part-time judge) Dermod O’Brien QC should be entitled to a judicial pension on retirement pro rata to the pension of full-time circuit judges. It is alleged that he has been discriminated against and that this is unlawful under European law as set out in the Part-time Workers Directive.</p>
<p>The Ministry of Justice has argued that this discrimination against part-time workers is not prohibited by European law, asserting that neither Mr O’Brien nor any judge “works” for, or is in an employment relationship with, anyone.</p>
<p>Part-time judges are paid pro rata to full time judges and are entitled to all the same benefits such as maternity and sick pay so should they not also receive the same pension’s rights as their full-time colleagues?</p>
<p><img style="float: left; padding: 2px 2px 10px 2px; border: 1px solid #999999; border-right: 2px solid #999999; border-bottom: 2px solid #999999;" src="http://www.brownejacobson.com/images/edward_benson_new_web.jpg" alt="" width="55" height="55" /></p>
<p style="float: left; margin-left: 8px;">Posted by Edward Benson<br />
0115 976 6211<br />
<a title="email edward benson" href="mailto:ebenson@brownejacobson.com">ebenson@brownejacobson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law-less-ordinary.co.uk/wordpress/2010/07/28/justice-for-judges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

